Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 27 2019, @09:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the We-[want-to]-see-what-you-did-there dept.

FBI: End-to-End Encryption Is an Infectious Problem

Just in case there were any lingering doubts about U.S. law enforcement's stance on end-to-end encryption, which prevents information from being read by anyone but its intended recipient, FBI executive assistant director Amy Hess told the Wall Street Journal this week that its use "is a problem that infects law enforcement and the intelligence community more and more so every day."

The quote was published in a piece about efforts from the UK, Australia and India to undermine end-to-end encryption. All three countries have passed or proposed legislation that compels tech companies to supply certain information to government agencies. The laws vary in their specifics, including restrictions on to what information law enforcement can request access, but the gist is that they don't want any data to be completely inaccessible.

Related: FBI Chief Calls for National Talk Over Encryption vs. Safety
FBI Failed to Access 7,000 Encrypted Mobile Devices
DOJ: Strong Encryption That We Don't Have Access to is "Unreasonable"
Five Eyes Governments Get Even Tougher on Encryption
Apple Speaks Out Against Australian Anti-Encryption Law; Police Advised Not to Trigger Face ID
Australia Set to Pass Controversial Encryption Law
Split Key Cryptography is Back... Again – Why Government Back Doors Don't Work


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Bot on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:31PM

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:31PM (#807860) Journal

    >where heads can roll
    where heads SHOULD roll, in all countries whose constitution says private communication is a right of the sovereign citizen.

    Constitutional right INFECTS law enforcement? then law is illegal.

    Private communication can be used for crimes Yes. Crimes have real world perpetrators and real world consequences, I am afraid law will have to look for those. If pleasing law enforcement and intelligence is more important, I suggest a dictatorship, the ability of making laws on the spot by policemen, and other 1984ish improvements.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5