Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday March 01 2019, @09:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the good dept.

University of California Boycotts Publishing Giant Elsevier Over Journal Costs and Open Access:

The mammoth University of California (UC) system announced today that it will stop paying to subscribe to journals published by Elsevier, the world’s largest scientific publisher. Talks to renew a collective contract broke down, the university said, because Elsevier refused to strike a package deal that would provide a break on subscription fees and make all articles published by UC authors immediately free for readers worldwide.

The stand by UC, which followed eight months of negotiations, could have significant impacts on scientific communication and the direction of the so-called open access movement, in the United States and beyond. The 10-campus system accounts for nearly 10 percent of all U.S. publishing output and is among the first American institutions, and by far the largest, to boycott Elsevier over costs. Many administrators and librarians at American universities and elsewhere have complained about what they view as excessively high journal subscription fees charged by commercial publishers.

“It’s hard to overstate how big  [UC’s move] is for us here in the U.S.,” says Heather Joseph, executive director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, a Washington D.C.-based group that advocates for open access. “This gives institutions that are on the fence about taking this kind of action a blueprint.”

Indeed, UC’s move could ratchet up pressure on additional negotiations facing Elsevier and other commercial publishers; consortia of universities and labs in Germany and Sweden had already reached an impasse last year with Elsevier in their efforts to lower subscription fees.

[...] UC published about 50,000 articles last year, and a substantial share, about 10,000, appeared in Elsevier journals. For subscriptions and article fees, UC paid about $11 million, the Los Angeles Times reported recently. (UC says the information is confidential under a non-disclosure agreement.)

There are still many other institutions which continue to purchase subscriptions to these journals. How far away are we from reaching a tipping point?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by HiThere on Friday March 01 2019, @03:59PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 01 2019, @03:59PM (#808746) Journal

    It's well to remember that the University of California has (or had?) their own publishing company. So printing their own magazines is not beyond the realm of feasible responses. Then they could charge money for anyone outside the system to get published.

    FWIW, despite the excellent faculty that the University of California has (or had?) the administration is rather like the third step of a technical company. (Step one: The entrepreneurs/engineers. Step to: The managers. Step three: the bean counters.) It's been going down hill ever since Clark Kerr decided that the best model of a University was a factory.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5