Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday March 05 2019, @10:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the have-to-wear-shades dept.

A MONTH WITHOUT SUNSPOTS: There are 28 days in February. This year, all 28 of them were spotless. The sun had no sunspots for the entire month of Feb. 2019.

The last time a full calendar month passed without a sunspot was August 2008. At the time, the sun was in the deepest Solar Minimum of the Space Age. Now a new Solar Minimum is in progress and it is shaping up to be similarly deep. So far this year, the sun has been blank 73% of the time--the same as 2008.

Solar Minimum is a normal part of the solar cycle. Every ~11 years, sunspot counts drop toward zero. Dark cores that produce solar flares and CMEs vanish from the solar disk, leaving the sun blank for long stretches of time. These minima have been coming and going with regularity since the sunspot cycle was discovered in 1859.

However, not all Solar Minima are alike. The last one in 2008-2009 surprised observers with its depth and side-effects. Sunspot counts dropped to a 100-year low; the sun dimmed by 0.1%; Earth's upper atmosphere collapsed, allowing space junk to accumulate; the pressure of the solar wind flagged while cosmic rays (normally repelled by solar wind) surged to Space Age highs. All these things are happening again.

http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=01&month=03&year=2019


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday March 05 2019, @01:00PM (15 children)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Tuesday March 05 2019, @01:00PM (#810220) Homepage Journal

    Possibly you're being sarcastic. But, think about it. They're saying our sun went dark in February. Just like in 2008, and 2009. Does anyone remember the type of weather we were having in February? INCREDIBLY COLD. And when the sun gets bright again, we have the hot weather again. But the Global Warming Hoaxers will say, "oh, it's horribly hot, we must ELIMINATE Clean Coal, Oil & Gas, delicious Hamburgers (Ocasio-Cortez), Cars & Planes, and our brave Soldiers!" WRONG, it's nothing we're doing, it's the sun going bright & dim, bright & dim. By the way, this is why we can't have Solar Energy. Because it only works when the sun is VERY BRIGHT!!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Flamebait=1, Funny=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @01:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @01:07PM (#810221)
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:05PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:05PM (#810308)

    "Does anyone remember the type of weather we were having in February? INCREDIBLY COLD."

    We were having cold weather in Febuary because it's WINTER and global warming has the effect of destabilizing the actic vortex (a very cold weather pattern over the arctic) and nudging it over north america - which it did in febuary which is why it was so cold. We literally had arctic weather reaching as far south as the northern united states.

    • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:34PM

      by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:34PM (#810323) Homepage Journal

      The northern part, it's not Arctic. But sometimes we call it Arctic. As in, Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, also known as A.N.W.R. After decades of waiting, we opened A.N.W.R. in Alaska for energy development. Very proud of that one!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:38PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @05:38PM (#810324)

      You are going to have a hell of a time convincing all the people brainwashed to fear global warming that the coming years of colder winters and heavier snows were part of the original prediction.

      It is hilarious to watch so far, because you can tell the people in the media know what will happen, but the "scientists" think people have been listening to their reasoned arguments this whole time.

      • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:41PM (1 child)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:41PM (#810390) Journal

        You are going to have a hell of a time convincing all the people brainwashed to fear global warming that the coming years of colder winters and heavier snows were part of the original prediction.

        It was ONE STORM!

        Thus far it has been an unusually warm winter in the US.

        And, NOAA predicts that 2019 is going to break the global-full-year record once again in 2019.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @10:17PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @10:17PM (#810446)

          And, NOAA predicts that 2019 is going to break the global-full-year record once again in 2019.

          Do you know the difference between weather and climate? One year is not climate.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:28PM (1 child)

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:28PM (#810382) Journal

      Meanwhile, Australia is literally on fire and setting heat record after heat record.

      2018-19 was Australia’s hottest summer on record, with a warm autumn likely too [theconversation.com]

      If you deniers want to bring anecdotes to this science fight I can find a crap-ton more of them than you can.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @08:42PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @08:42PM (#810414)

        The hubris of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology is on full display with its most recent remodelling of the historic temperature record for Darwin. The Bureau has further dramatically increased the rate of global warming at Darwin by further artificially lowering historic temperatures.

        This begins by shortening the historical temperature record so that it begins just after the very hot years of the Federation drought. Then by changing the daily values: that is changing the observed measured temperatures to something else.

        For example, on 1st January 1910 the maximum temperature recorded at the Darwin post office was 34.2 degrees Celsius.

        A few years ago, the Bureau changed this to 33.8 degrees Celsius, cooling the recorded temperature by 0.4 degrees. In its most recent re-revision of Darwin’s climate history the temperature on this day has been further reduced, and is now just 32.8.

        https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/22/changes-to-darwins-climate-history-are-not-logical/ [wattsupwiththat.com]

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Wednesday March 06 2019, @03:41AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Wednesday March 06 2019, @03:41AM (#810560) Homepage

      Then where the hell was it in January, when it was so warm in Montana that the grass started greening up? Our punishment for this pleasant state of affairs being that now we're having January again, down to -24F night before last. I think my calendar is broken.

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:25PM (4 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:25PM (#810378) Journal
    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:37PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:37PM (#810385)

      Forbes astrophysicist, Ethan Siegel summarizes the new normal:

      That guy is no better than the inquisition, please do not link to him:

      The blogger (@StartsWithABang) contacted @scilogscom on January 24 by replying to a 15-day old tweet that announced our blog’s move to the new domain. He tweeted “Bummed that @scilogscom is in the business of promoting contrarian scientist viewpoints.”, and asks the SciLogs.com community manager (@notscientific) “[Why] are you allowing @scilogscom to promote contrarian voices that undermine public understanding of [science]?”, adding “You have taken on “Dark Matter Crisis” blog, whose mission is to undermine all of physical cosmology & promote MOND.”

              The two agreed to discuss the issue via email, with the blogger adding that he was “*personally* worried that you are promoting clicks & false controversy over quality science content”, and states that he is “very, VERY disappointed about this move that @scilogscom has made”.

              By now the SciLogs.com community manager has explained to us what happened after these tweets. He and the publishing director responsible for SciLogs.com unfortunately assumed that the blogger’s criticism was justified. They decided to close our blog without conferring with others or asking us for a statement. After we complained about the discontinuation, they performed an internal investigation, which involved reaching out to astrophysicists and other people, and have realized that discontinuing our blog was a big mistake. We attribute SciLogs.com’s poor judgement to two factors: neither the community manager nor the publishing director has an (astro)physical background, it was the first time that SciLogs.com had experienced an attack against one of its blogs.

      https://darkmattercrisis.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/the-dark-matter-crisis-continues-on-the-difficulties-of-communicating-controversial-science/ [wordpress.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @09:50PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @09:50PM (#810437)

      Why bother? The idiots think they are stable geniuses who are free thinking enough to see the truth. There is no combatting that level of narcissism.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @10:24PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @10:24PM (#810449)

        You're responding to someone who "knows" "weather isn't climate" yet posts stuff like that everywhere anyway. Apparently it is to counteract "the other team" doing it somehow. When summer comes watch all the posts about how hot it is, but we all know weather isn't climate wink wink.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 06 2019, @05:41PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 06 2019, @05:41PM (#810778)

          When you aggregate the local weather it becoooomes the climate *gasp*

          A wide spread trend record heat is a good indicator of the climate. The cold snaps are also a good indicator if they aren't accompanied by a drop in the average temps. Climate change causes chaotic weather patterns, and don't forget that melting ice which will cause temporary cold conditions.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 06 2019, @12:44AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 06 2019, @12:44AM (#810512)

    this is why we can't have Solar Energy. Because it only works when the sun is VERY BRIGHT!!

    Ah! This explains why you haven't worked a day in your life! :-D

    Peace! MuBrutha! You still the man!