Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday March 05 2019, @07:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the who's-next? dept.

Google Finds It's Underpaying Many Men as It Addresses Wage Equity

When Google conducted a study recently to determine whether the company was underpaying women and members of minority groups, it found, to the surprise of just about everyone, that men were paid less money than women for doing similar work.

The study, which disproportionately led to pay raises for thousands of men, is done every year, but the latest findings arrived as Google and other companies in Silicon Valley face increasing pressure to deal with gender issues in the workplace, from sexual harassment to wage discrimination.

Gender inequality is a radioactive topic at Google. The Labor Department is investigating whether the company systematically underpays women. It has been sued by former employees who claim they were paid less than men with the same qualifications. And last fall, thousands of Google employees protested the way the company handles sexual harassment claims against top executives.

Critics said the results of the pay study could give a false impression. Company officials acknowledged that it did not address whether women were hired at a lower pay grade than men with similar qualifications.

In response to the study, pay raises were given out to 10,677 employees, with men accounting for 69% of Google's employees but an undisclosed higher percentage of the raises.

Google blog post. Also at Ars Technica, NPR, and TechCrunch.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @08:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05 2019, @08:32PM (#810410)

    These findings mean that the problem they were trying to correct was real, but they over-corrected and are now pushing back a bit.

    Is there any data they could find that you wouldn't twist to support your pre-existing worldview?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Troll=1, Insightful=2, Touché=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2