Someone shared on Trisquel's forums a direct email communication with Purism revealing the way the company avoids being fully transparent about the fact that their device does not offer better privacy when used *as a phone* — it has privacy advantages only when the phone functionality is completely turned off, in which case the questioner claims it is nothing more than a pocket (or even stationary) PC.
Source:
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/librem5-and-why-i-am-no-longer-interested
(Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday March 06 2019, @10:37PM (2 children)
By having a "completely turn off the phone functionality" feature in the first place? That sounds like ... success?
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Thursday March 07 2019, @01:10AM (1 child)
I presume you mean a hardware break the circuit type "turn off" not a software signal indicating it should turn off (exactly why one must currently remove the battery to get privacy presently) -- but yeah, that is basically the best we can get at this point if you wish to have a phone.
(Score: 2) by krishnoid on Thursday March 07 2019, @01:42AM
I don't know why it can't be a 'slide a plastic strip across the battery contacts' thing instead of removing the whole battery, though.