Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday March 07 2019, @05:40AM   Printer-friendly

In a presentation at this year's RSA Conference, taking place in San Francisco this week, Dr L Jean Camp, a professor at Indiana University Bloomington in the US, and her doctoral candidate Sanchari Das, detailed their research into why people aren't using Yubico security keys or Google’s hardware tokens for multi-factor authentication (MFA).

For those who don't know: typically, you use these gadgets to provide an extra layer of security when logging into systems. You enter your username and password as usual, then plug the USB-based key into your computer and tap a button to activate it. The thing you're trying to log into checks the username and password are correct, and that the physical key is valid and tied to your account, before letting you in.

That means a crook has to know your username and password, and have your physical key to log in as you. We highly recommend you investigate activating MFA on your online accounts, particularly important ones such as your webmail.

What the pair found during their research work derails any previous assumptions that the lack of MFA uptake is because people are stupid, or can't use the technology. What it comes down to is education and communicating risk.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by PiMuNu on Thursday March 07 2019, @09:38AM (4 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday March 07 2019, @09:38AM (#811091)

    Two reasons:
    * Just plug in this dongle from .
    * while $N > 0: plug in dongle from ; $N++;

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday March 07 2019, @02:59PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday March 07 2019, @02:59PM (#811143) Homepage
    There is that. Here, there's been a recent step forwards in simplification of 2FA.

    In the past, banks would let you use either their in-house 2-factor security (I use a RSA-style PIN generator, but mobile phone-based ones are available for those with the right phones), or the official governmental ID card. The logic being that if it's secure enough for the government to trust you to submit tax returns and sign company accounts, it's secure enough to do banking operations.

    However, in a bold step forward, the government has said that they would now let you use either their in-house 2-factor security - the forementioned national ID card - or an approved bank's authentification mechanism (PIN generator or mobile-id) for authentication/identification purposes (alas not for signing). The logic being that if it's secure enough to permit the emptying of bank accounts, it's secure enough to fill in tax returns.

    The bloody ID card doesn't work on my computer (fuck Java!), so I always had to go round to other people's places (typically the local pub!) to do official governmental business, but now I can use my bank fob I'm freed from that palaver.

    Anyway, I've gone from needing two "things you have" to one thing you have, I can chose which one I want to have with me at any time.

    All online stores here have historically accepted either bank or governmental authintification, so it's true for almost anyone doing anything - nobody needs more than one "thing" any more. (Most use mobile-id on their phone, I believe.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by PiMuNu on Thursday March 07 2019, @04:17PM (1 child)

      by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday March 07 2019, @04:17PM (#811172)

      Interesting, they tried such a thing in the UK, but the implementation is so terrible that no one (including government departments) wants to use it...

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Friday March 08 2019, @12:45PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday March 08 2019, @12:45PM (#811511) Homepage
        Estonia was a country that reinvented its infrastructure, almost every part of it (exceptions being the mechanical things like the presence/absence of roads, tram tracks, and trolley-bus power lines), upon reindependence. Its legal system was put together by academics who knew other countries' systems inside out, and borrowed only the best bits from exemplar states (Germany/Finland I'm guessing). It knew tech was the future, and basically looked at Finland's example and said "we can do that quicker than you, as we have no backward compatibility to worry about", and indeed caught up very quickly, and indeed did get the jump on Finland for a few things - e.g. paying for car parking using an SMS on your phone. So it's unsurprising we have such integrated infrastructures, we have the highest rate of electronic home voting too (I think more than half of the votes were electronic this year (and the split between the parties in the pre-counted evotes vs. the final result was very telling - you can see which parties attract votes from smart modern types, and which from dinosaurs!).

        People sometimes ask me why I left the UK 2 decades ago - it's because I saw the future.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Thursday March 07 2019, @04:14PM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday March 07 2019, @04:14PM (#811168)

    Should have read Just plug in this dongle from $CORPORATE_OVERLORDS. I used angle brackets!