Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday March 08 2019, @10:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the do-you-see-what-I-see? dept.

Hipster Whines at Tech mag for Using his pic to Imply Hipsters Look the Same, Discovers pic was of an Entirely Different Hipster :

At the end of February, MIT Technology Review emitted a pithy rundown of a 34-page research paper from maths-modelling boffins at Brandeis University in the US; the paper essentially posited that in a bid to make that all-important "countercultural statement", hipsters can end up looking alike. For groovy models of how random acts by hipsters "undergo a phase transition into a synchronized state" – along with some knotty network equations – see here [PDF].

Accompanying the article was an edited stock image of a generic millennial chap in plaid shirt and standard-issue beanie, or "trendy winter attire", as Getty put it.

The MIT journal's editor-in-chief, Gideon Lichfield, took to Twitter to tell a "cautionary tale" about what followed the article going live:

"We promptly got a furious email from a man who said he was the guy in the photo that ran with the story. He accused us of slandering him, presumably by implying he was a hipster, and of using the pic without his permission. (He wasn't too complimentary about the story, either.)"

[...] Lichfield pointed out that he didn't think calling someone a hipster was "unflattering or unduly controversial" but contacted Getty to be safe.

The stock photo giant checked the model release and lo! The guy in the image wasn't even the same dude who was complaining. "He'd misidentified himself," Lichfield said.

"All of which just proves the story we ran: hipsters look so much alike that they can't even tell themselves apart from each other."

Maybe he was confused after renting this movie?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @08:22PM (8 children)

    That would be them failing to use them properly, yes. They're not meant for accusing individuals with. They're stating something that's true often enough that you need to be aware of it.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by aristarchus on Friday March 08 2019, @09:17PM (7 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Friday March 08 2019, @09:17PM (#811744) Journal

    Yes, but while TMB's point that the stereotype that all TMBs are racist is onyl mostly true, and the mistake is to take it as a universal truth which would justify in knowing that TMB is racist, when the inductive nature of stereotype formation only makes it likely that the TMB is actually racist, it is still true that TMB is probably racist. Quite the feat for a Tribal Member.

    Now the point is that a stereotype can itself be wrong, even as a matter of probability, particularly when it is the result of racist presumptions. So we must be careful with claiming that they are useful and that we only need to be on the lookout for the exception that proves the rule. We need a proper categorical syllogism.

    For example, someone might aver, "All conservatives are stupid". This is an over-generalization, even though it contains a certain truth. John Stuart Mill famously [wikiquote.org] corrected the inference: "While it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that all stupid people are conservative".

    So, not all racists are TMB, but all TMB's are racist. Stereotype seems legit, based on posting history.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @11:15PM (6 children)

      I'm not racist anymore. I haven't watched a single one since Dale Earnhardt died.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:05AM (5 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:05AM (#811904)

        One weird way to submit a QED.

        Not that I'm saying ALL Nasscar enthusiasts are racist, but stereotypically they all are.

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:52PM (2 children)

          by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:52PM (#812021) Homepage Journal

          No, they all are. Race-ist. And quit trying to make a perfectly good dumb joke boring by taking it seriously.

          --
          My rights don't end where your fear begins.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 10 2019, @07:01PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 10 2019, @07:01PM (#812379)

            Deflect all you want, my comment was obviously a play on your stupid axiom and I was throwing it in your face to see how you like it. Buncha sensitive little kiddos that like to dish it out but can't take the heat themselves.

            Ah well, not surprising in the slightest.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @06:30PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @06:30PM (#812087)

          So my black friend who has lived his whole life in the city of Detroit, and had the dream of being a NASCAR driver when he was young is a racist?