Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Friday March 08 2019, @05:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the didn't-inhale dept.

[...] Musk has a top-secret level clearance because the company he founded and leads is certified to launch military spy satellites for the US government.

The review underscores the ramifications of Musk's appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast in September, where he took a puff of a marijuana blunt during the livestream. Musk's appearance on the program didn't sit well with NASA's top officials, who earlier this month ordered a review of the workplace cultures of SpaceX and Boeing.

NASA's contracts with the aerospace companies -- worth a combined total of $6.8 billion -- require both companies "maintain a program for achieving a drug-and alcohol-free workforce."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by ikanreed on Friday March 08 2019, @08:12PM (1 child)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 08 2019, @08:12PM (#811695) Journal

    Several reasons, really.

    1. He took a well-planned luxury electric car company, bought a majority stake, then paid a fortune in PR money to make it synonymous with him.
    1a. Then he ran it into the ground
    1b. Added DRM to cars
    2. He's quashed unions, made false allegations of mass murder terrorism to the FBI against a safety whistleblower from one of his plants.
    3. He's managed to insinuate himself into the public transit politics through the hyperloop/boring company never gonna happen promises, and successfully derailed legitimate mass transit plans to propose a car-tunnel based solution lightyears outside the realm of pragmatism
    4. He accused a hero who saved several dozen people's lives of pedophilia for lightly criticizing him
    5. (not his fault)Become an icon of "self made billionaires" when he really just invested his parents' diamond mine money at the right time and place in the dotcom bubble
    6. "Oh haha, I was only joking that a third party was offering extremely high prices for privatization when my stock prices were crashing"

    To my knowledge, SpaceX has mostly been a pretty good thing. Boeing and Lockheed and Northap Gruman are parasites, and disrupting them is great.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Friday March 08 2019, @09:25PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Friday March 08 2019, @09:25PM (#811759)

    Wow, thank you, great answer, I didn't know most of those details. I tend to look at the good someone does. I'm not sure how to weigh the good and bad that he's done. Often in life bad comes with good, but of course sometimes the bad is intolerable, and those debates rage on around the world.

    My only response: it was the pot made him do the bad things. Or maybe the pot made him do the good things.