Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday March 10 2019, @08:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the Betteridge-Says:-Reduce,-Reuse,-and-THEN-Recycle dept.

Is This the End of Recycling?

For decades, we were sending the bulk of our recycling to China—tons and tons of it, sent over on ships to be made into goods such as shoes and bags and new plastic products. But last year, the country restricted imports of certain recyclables, including mixed paper—magazines, office paper, junk mail—and most plastics. Waste-management companies across the country are telling towns, cities, and counties that there is no longer a market for their recycling. These municipalities have two choices: pay much higher rates to get rid of recycling, or throw it all away.

Most are choosing the latter. "We are doing our best to be environmentally responsible, but we can't afford it," said Judie Milner, the city manager of Franklin, New Hampshire. Since 2010, Franklin has offered curbside recycling and encouraged residents to put paper, metal, and plastic in their green bins. When the program launched, Franklin could break even on recycling by selling it for $6 a ton. Now, Milner told me, the transfer station is charging the town $125 a ton to recycle, or $68 a ton to incinerate. One-fifth of Franklin's residents live below the poverty line, and the city government didn't want to ask them to pay more to recycle, so all those carefully sorted bottles and cans are being burned. Milner hates knowing that Franklin is releasing toxins into the environment, but there's not much she can do. "Plastic is just not one of the things we have a market for," she said.

The same thing is happening across the country. Broadway, Virginia, had a recycling program for 22 years, but recently suspended it after Waste Management told the town that prices would increase by 63 percent, and then stopped offering recycling pickup as a service. "It almost feels illegal, to throw plastic bottles away," the town manager, Kyle O'Brien, told me.

Without a market for mixed paper, bales of the stuff started to pile up in Blaine County, Idaho; the county eventually stopped collecting it and took the 35 bales it had hoped to recycle to a landfill. The town of Fort Edward, New York, suspended its recycling program in July and admitted it had actually been taking recycling to an incinerator for months. Determined to hold out until the market turns around, the nonprofit Keep Northern Illinois Beautiful has collected 400,000 tons of plastic. But for now, it is piling the bales behind the facility where it collects plastic.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday March 11 2019, @09:02PM (10 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Monday March 11 2019, @09:02PM (#812912) Homepage
    As you have so done. Quite why putting your hands over your ears, closing your eyes, and chanting "I REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR EXTERNALITIES" has become so popular as a battle cry, I will never know. Maybe it's something in the water.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday March 12 2019, @03:41AM (2 children)

    Externalities is just another word used to rationalize treating your fellow humans in ways that are fundamentally wrong.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday March 12 2019, @09:56AM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Tuesday March 12 2019, @09:56AM (#813151) Homepage
      At least you're happy proving my point. Better someone consistent, even if they're consistently wrong on how a modern forward-thinking society can (not should, but can, taking a long-termist view) work, than someone who's all over the shop. Alas we'll both be dead when your way is proved to have been terribly dysfunctional.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 13 2019, @05:03AM (6 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 13 2019, @05:03AM (#813591) Journal

    Quite why putting your hands over your ears, closing your eyes, and chanting "I REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR EXTERNALITIES" has become so popular as a battle cry, I will never know. Maybe it's something in the water.

    Are those EXTERNALITIES real or imaginary? There's no good reason to acknowledge the latter. One doesn't need to put hands over ears, close eyes, and chant to do that.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday March 13 2019, @08:16PM (5 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday March 13 2019, @08:16PM (#813905) Homepage
      Not just real, but measurable. Just because it's easy to point the finger at Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, and identify worse places, it would take an special type of ostrich to not recognise that lots of the US is now pretty darned toxic, or at least despoiled for a very long time.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday March 13 2019, @10:46PM (4 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 13 2019, @10:46PM (#813962) Journal

        Just because it's easy to point the finger at Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, and identify worse places

        The only externality you ever mentioned [soylentnews.org] was the oceanic plastics pollution. Africa and Asia apparently are responsible by themselves for more than [soylentnews.org] an order of magnitude more such pollution than the rest of the world combined. At that point, you're not speaking merely of "worse" places, but rather the entire problem.

        Once again, it's remarkable just how little support there is for the assertion that landfill disposal of plastics is environmentally harmful. Meanwhile we ignore the considerable environmental harm from recycling, particularly the waste of human effort and time (plus the fact that so much of it isn't actually recycling in the first place, but phony, costly theater to placate environmentally minded voters. Who knows how much of the plastic released by Asia and Africa came from recycling programs in the developed world?). I see you wrote [soylentnews.org] on that:

        It's infrastructural. The overheads of individual companies doing it do not make sense, even if the idea as a whole does. C.f. roads, railways, air traffic control, ...

        In other words, like so many other things thoughtlessly done by governments, generic recycling is a huge money sink that wouldn't make sense at all, if a private business were to consider doing it. And only by imposing large fees [soylentnews.org] on usage can one get compliance.

        In Finland the last figure I saw for bottle returns was 97%, meaning each bottle gets re-used over 30 times on average. It's possible, it just requires people to be persuaded to give a shit. (The deposit will buy you about a tenth of a beer, which is worth it if you're a Finn! Having said that, the summer open area bottle return scourers seem to no longer be little old Finnish ladies, most of them are highly organised groups of Romanians that appear to have, mafia-style, their own familial regions of turf to patrol. And let me tell you, Vappu = kerching!)

        • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday March 14 2019, @08:11AM (3 children)

          by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday March 14 2019, @08:11AM (#814111) Homepage
          OK, so another thing you don't understand about economics is the economies of scale. I'll add that to the list.

          The list currently contains: everything.
          --
          Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
          • (Score: 0, Troll) by khallow on Thursday March 14 2019, @05:19PM (2 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 14 2019, @05:19PM (#814312) Journal

            OK, so another thing you don't understand about economics is the economies of scale.

            Uh huh. "We lose money on every sale, but make it up in volume."

            The list currently contains: everything.

            Such cutting wit! A threat to mashed potatoes everywhere!

            • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday March 15 2019, @12:36PM (1 child)

              by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Friday March 15 2019, @12:36PM (#814727) Homepage
              Holy jesus, you just keep getting more and more stupid.

              You appear unable to understand why 5 in the top 30 most profitable companies in the world have fabs (one of which is *nothing* but a fab), yet there are no mom'n'pop fabs.
              --
              Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 15 2019, @05:13PM

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 15 2019, @05:13PM (#814888) Journal

                You appear unable to understand why 5 in the top 30 most profitable companies in the world have fabs (one of which is *nothing* but a fab), yet there are no mom'n'pop fabs.

                Fabs != recycling. And 30 most profitable companies != mom'n'pop anything. You're compare Buicks and Cuban cigars.

                Further, I imagine that there's a fair number of impressive logistics systems among those 30 most profitable companies. Recycling a waste stream is not that big a deal for a large business. Just because it's not worth it at any scale doesn't mean it can't be done.