Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday March 11 2019, @01:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the top-gun-will-never-be-the-same dept.

The US Air Force’s jet-powered robotic wingman is like something out of a video game

The US Air Force has successfully tested an advanced, jet-powered drone called the XQ58-A Valkyrie, that could someday accompany human-piloted fighter jets on missions. The concept is a bit like something we’ve seen in video games, a drone (or swarm of drones) can fight alongside a human pilot, or absorb enemy fire in their place.

The vehicle was developed as a partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory and Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems as a relatively cheap platform that can fill a electronic warfare, strike, and surveillance role on the battlefield, controlled by a piloted aircraft on its own or as part of a swarm group. It can carry a small payload of bombs, and can use a conventional runway or can be launched via rocket.

The prototype completed its first test flight (of five planned missions) on March 5th over the Yuma Proving Grounds in Arizona, and the Air Force says that it “behaved as expected” over the course of its 76-minute flight. The battery of test flights that it will go through will look at how well the drone’s systems worked, and how well it takes off, flies and lands.

What’s interesting about this particular plan is that it’s an early demonstration of a concept called “loyal wingman.” While this test saw the drone fly on its own — not alongside the fighter aircraft that it’s designed to accompany in the future — the idea is that it could fly alongside a piloted vehicle, which would control it. From there, it could do everything from provide a bit of extra force projection in the air, fly ahead to scout out terrain, or even taking enemy fire in place of its human-piloted companion.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Monday March 11 2019, @04:05PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Monday March 11 2019, @04:05PM (#812739)

    they will never be risked in any sort of close air combat

    Any what? My understanding is that close air combat has become extremely rare, mostly due to 2 factors:
    1. The US doesn't generally have to go up against other nations that have air forces that pose a serious threat to US aircraft. For instance, in the 2003 Iraq invasion, not a single Iraqi plane actually took off.

    2. There are these things called guided missiles that make air combat more a matter of "press a button at 15 miles away" rather than anything resembling the footage of furballs over World War II battlefields or even the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. And that can be done from the ground at least as well as from a fighter, again because you don't need to be anywhere near the enemy in order to attack them.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5