SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the eople-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-peopl dept.
Submitted via IRC for FatPhil
Social media and internet not cause of political polarisation (new research suggests)
Using a random sample of adult internet users in the UK, researchers at the Oxford Internet Institute and the University of Ottawa examined people’s media choices, and how much they influenced their interaction with echo chambers, against six key variables: gender, income, ethnicity, age, breadth of media use and political interest. The findings reveal that rather than encouraging the use and development of echo chambers, the breadth of multimedia available actually makes it easier for people to avoid them.
Dr Grant Blank, co-author and research fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute, said: ‘Whatever the causes of political polarisation today, it is not social media or the internet.
‘If anything, most people use the internet to broaden their media horizons. We found evidence that people actively look to confirm the information that they read online, in a multitude of ways. They mainly do this by using a search engine to find offline media and validate political information. In the process they often encounter opinions that differ from their own and as a result whether they stumbled across the content passively or use their own initiative to search for answers while double checking their “facts”, some changed their own opinion on certain issues.’
[...] Dr Elizabeth Dubois, co-author and Assistant Professor at the University of Ottawa, said: ‘Our results show that most people are not in a political echo chamber. The people at risk are those who depend on only a single medium for political news and who are not politically interested: about 8% of the population. However, because of their lack of political engagement, their opinions are less formative and their influence on others is likely to be comparatively small.’
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media, Elizabeth Dubois & Grant Blank in Information, Communication & Society. 2018 (DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656)
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @04:06AM (3 children)
You are adorable! Do you believe in the tooth fairy too?
There's far more corruption and abuse of power in state and local governments than there is in the Federal government.
Don't take my word for it either. Go look at the data yourself.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @07:40AM
Lucky us he's only a-dorable and not anti-dorable.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by exaeta on Wednesday March 13 2019, @10:13AM
Have to agree here. I've personally dealt with both governments and I can definitely confirm my state is much more corrupt than the federal government.
Life tenure for judges was a great idea, elections for judges not so much. Elections lead to corrupt judges, unfortunately.
The Government is a Bird
(Score: 2) by DeVilla on Friday March 15 2019, @04:46AM
There's corruption at all levels. But my city council and mayor have to look me and our neighbors in the eye. We know each other on a first name basis. I know a lot of places aren't like that, but it a feature to look for in a community. And even though I live in such a small town, we still are visited, in person, by our state legislators pretty regularly and not just during the election cycle. Seeing the governor is town is less common, but has happened.
I've never seen my federal reps in person. Don't know who they answer to, but it's not me or my neighbors. The corruption in D.C. consistently makes anything happening here seem pretty benign.