Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday March 12 2019, @11:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the eople-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-people-crab-peopl dept.

Submitted via IRC for FatPhil

Social media and internet not cause of political polarisation (new research suggests)

Using a random sample of adult internet users in the UK, researchers at the Oxford Internet Institute and the University of Ottawa examined people’s media choices, and how much they influenced their interaction with echo chambers, against six key variables: gender, income, ethnicity, age, breadth of media use and political interest. The findings reveal that rather than encouraging the use and development of echo chambers, the breadth of multimedia available actually makes it easier for people to avoid them.

Dr Grant Blank, co-author and research fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute, said: ‘Whatever the causes of political polarisation today, it is not social media or the internet.

‘If anything, most people use the internet to broaden their media horizons. We found evidence that people actively look to confirm the information that they read online, in a multitude of ways. They mainly do this by using a search engine to find offline media and validate political information. In the process they often encounter opinions that differ from their own and as a result whether they stumbled across the content passively or use their own initiative to search for answers while double checking their “facts”, some changed their own opinion on certain issues.’

[...] Dr Elizabeth Dubois, co-author and Assistant Professor at the University of Ottawa, said: ‘Our results show that most people are not in a political echo chamber. The people at risk are those who depend on only a single medium for political news and who are not politically interested: about 8% of the population. However, because of their lack of political engagement, their opinions are less formative and their influence on others is likely to be comparatively small.’

The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media, Elizabeth Dubois & Grant Blank in Information, Communication & Society. 2018 (DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Thursday March 14 2019, @12:41AM

    by Snotnose (1623) on Thursday March 14 2019, @12:41AM (#813990)

    I get along fine with my neighbors, co-workers, and folks in my excersize class. Some are R's, others are D's. We're all disgusted with the way things work in Washington, and with the sheer amount of $$$ that flows into elections.

    My and my acquaintances aren't the problem, we all feel left out. The problem lies elsewhere.

    Some ideas pulled out of my ass after a couple beers:

    1) No paid commercials for politicians
    2) Super-PACs are banned
    3) Politicians wear patches indicating who supports them, much like Nascar
    4) Spending is capped at the annual salary for the office you seek.
    5) Serious jail time, and a lifetime ban on political office, if you violate these.

    --
    When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2