Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday March 13 2019, @09:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the SPF50 dept.

The sun is quiet ... very quiet.

In February, for the first time since August 2008, the sun went an entire month without any sunspots.

Sunspots are cooler regions of the sun. How many appear on the sun's surface depends on what cycle the sun is in. Every 11 years our star goes through a maximum, followed by a minimum (the entire magnetic cycle of the sun, when the poles flip, is 22 years).

Over the past three decades, the sun has been consistently dropping in activity. Maximum has been quieter than is typical; minimum has been particularly quiet. And this has caused some to make the false assumption that, as a result, Earth is going to cool.

It all stems from an incident that took place between 1645 and 1715, called the Maunder Minimum, where sunspots all but disappeared. This coincided with the "Little Ice Age" that stretched from 1500 to 1850 in the northern hemisphere. In England, the Thames River froze over; Viking settlers abandoned Greenland.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/solar-activity-1.5049337


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @11:42AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @11:42AM (#813680)

    That document I linked is from 2019 and it cites stuff from 2018 but not that 2016 paper you linked to. He does discuss the CERN CLOUD project on page 13-14 though. I see there he is claiming the effect of the cosmic rays is on the growth of already nucleated particles, not nucleation rates like Dunne 2016 talks about.

  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Wednesday March 13 2019, @12:22PM (1 child)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Wednesday March 13 2019, @12:22PM (#813688)

    > That document I linked is from 2019

    Interesting. I found this publication by Svensmark et al:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02082-2 [nature.com]

    referenced from here if you can't see through nature paywall:

    https://scitechdaily.com/how-cosmic-rays-from-supernovae-influence-earths-cloud-cover/ [scitechdaily.com]

    which supports your argument.

    (I am a terrible person so I tend to ignore the "some guy wrote something on the internet" and go for the journal papers instead. I don't believe the journal papers, but at least they have passed someone's credibility threshold and are not cranky nonsense).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @12:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 13 2019, @12:30PM (#813692)

      Svensmark was the author of that document, so if you trust his journal articles to be non-cranky you can trust that as a high level review.