Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Thursday March 14 2019, @06:02AM   Printer-friendly

U.S. Grounds Boeing Planes, After Days of Pressure

After days of mounting pressure, the United States grounded Boeing's 737 Max aircraft on Wednesday, reversing an earlier decision in which American regulators said the planes could keep flying after a deadly crash in Ethiopia.

The decision, announced by President Trump, followed determinations by safety regulators in some 42 countries to ban flights by the jets, which are now grounded worldwide. Pilots, flight attendants, consumers and politicians from both major parties had been agitating for the planes to be grounded in the United States. Despite the clamor, the Federal Aviation Administration had been resolute, saying on Tuesday that it had seen "no systemic performance issues" that would prompt it to halt flights of the jet.

That changed Wednesday when, in relatively quick succession, Canadian and American aviation authorities said they were grounding the planes after newly available satellite-tracking data suggested similarities between Sunday's crash in Ethiopia and one involving a Boeing 737 Max 8 in Indonesia in October.

Previously: Second 737 MAX8 Airplane Crash Reinforces Speculation on Flying System Problems

Related: Boeing 737 MAX 8 Could Enable $69 Trans-Atlantic Flights


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 14 2019, @08:22AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 14 2019, @08:22AM (#814114)

    With MCAS off, there isn't much extra chance of a stall. The positive feedback does mean that you have to be a little careful, perhaps, and that this is different from an old 737. As you pitch up (purposely) on an old 737, you'd need to apply more and more force. As you do likewise on the new 737, you find that it suddenly gets easier. Well, don't just shove the controls and expect resistance to not weaken. That isn't so hard to learn. Granted, it would be best to practice this in a simulator, but any pilot should be able to manage the oddity.

    Flying manually without MCAS is not any more trouble than that. This isn't a B2 or F117. It's just a passenger jet with some positive feedback to catch you off guard if you aren't expecting it.

    With or without MCAS, the whole problem is fixable with pilot education. Trouble is, that would mean the airplane doesn't count as a 737 for regulatory purposes. It wouldn't be grandfathered in, and airlines would not be able to toss a random ordinary 737 pilot in the cockpit. Boeing is going to try really hard to keep this aircraft as just another 737, using patched software and avoiding any extra training requirement.

    Despite the certification as just another 737, Southwest decided to have special training and to add a warning for inconsistent sensor readings. Those pilots should still be able to fly those planes.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by PocketSizeSUn on Thursday March 14 2019, @02:36PM (2 children)

    by PocketSizeSUn (5340) on Thursday March 14 2019, @02:36PM (#814223)

    With or without MCAS, the whole problem is fixable with pilot education. Trouble is, that would mean the airplane doesn't count as a 737 for regulatory purposes. It wouldn't be grandfathered in, and airlines would not be able to toss a random ordinary 737 pilot in the cockpit. Boeing is going to try really hard to keep this aircraft as just another 737, using patched software and avoiding any extra training requirement.

    Sounds like reckless disregard for customers, pilots and passengers.

    Despite the certification as just another 737, Southwest decided to have special training and to add a warning for inconsistent sensor readings. Those pilots should still be able to fly those planes.

    That is good to know. When the training is mandatory and the pending 'fixes' are applied then maybe flying a MAX that isn't being flown by southwest pilots would be safe. As it is Boeing needs to be held accountable and perhaps the FAA and other regulatory bodies should be considering how to fix the hole in the regulations that allowed Boeing to pass off the (very bad) redesign as just the same 'ol plane.

    The actions of Boeing have been reckless as the consequences had to have been understood, otherwise why would Southwest have decide to have special training for the MAX?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 14 2019, @03:08PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 14 2019, @03:08PM (#814239)

      The extra training that Southwest uses will not be mandatory. Boeing will really fight that because it would break certification. That would make airlines much less interested in buying the aircraft. Nearly the whole point of this awful design is to avoid needing to train pilots.

      The other trouble is that the grandfathered certification would be lost. Extra requirements would then be added, such as triple-redundant sensors, jacking up the cost of the aircraft. If that happens, Boeing might as well just design a totally new aircraft.

    • (Score: 2) by mrchew1982 on Thursday March 14 2019, @11:47PM

      by mrchew1982 (3565) on Thursday March 14 2019, @11:47PM (#814539)

      Boeing is hurting bad right now... Lockheed got the contract for the next military airplane, SpaceX is murdering them in the rocket launch business, they almost lost the airtanker bid to BAE for bribery, Airbus is nipping at their heels for passenger jets, China really wants to start making their own passenger jets, etc.

      At this point I think Boeing needs a major shake up at the top, maybe even splitting all of those different branches mentioned above into separate companies.