Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday March 15 2019, @12:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the Both-Sideism dept.

Homeland Security’s Intelligence Overreach: Two Cases Illustrate Risks to Civil Society:

Two stories this week show how the Department of Homeland Security is deploying its intelligence apparatus against activists, journalists, and human rights lawyers. While this type of political surveillance rightly raises serious concerns, it is hardly surprising given the immense growth in DHS’s intelligence gathering programs during and since the Obama administration, and the lack of meaningful standards, safeguards, and oversight of their operation.

[...]NBC7 San Diego published a leaked copy of a set of slides titled “San Diego Sector Foreign Operations Branch: Migrant Caravan FY-2019, Suspected Organizers, Coordinators, Instigators and Media,” dated January 9, 2019. The document, which appears under a U.S.-Mexican seal, is essentially a surveillance target list with photographs of 59 people, 40 of whom are identified as U.S. citizens, all of whom seem to have some connection to migrant caravans heading from Central America to the United States. “Alerts” have been placed against the information of 43 people, including 28 Americans. DHS kept dossiers on the targets as well, including one that was shared with NBC 7 on[sic] Nicole Ramos, an attorney with a legal center for migrants and refugees in Tijuana, Mexico.

DHS claims it was tracking people who were in the vicinity of violence near the border in November 2018 and just wanted to talk to them as part of its investigation of those incidents. This justification rings hollow; it is much more plausible that the agency was tagging people based on their perceived involvement with the caravan, not as potential witnesses to any incident of violence.

[...]Far from the southern border, officers of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division of DHS in New York City were also keeping tabs on protests. Documents obtained by The Nation via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request included a spreadsheet of public protests, titled “Anti-Trump Protest Spreadsheet 07/31/2018.”

The document covered protests during the two-week period from July 31 to August 17, suggesting that such monitoring may be undertaken on a regular basis. It also showed the number of people who had signed up for the protests on Facebook, indicating that ICE was monitoring social media to follow political movements.

DHS claims it was monitoring leftist activists in New York to provide agents from ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) unit with “situational awareness” information in case they were traveling through the city “on work or personal time.” Again, the title of the document gives away what is likely the agency’s true intent: the list is not about protests or demonstrations in general, it is focused on “anti-Trump” (and anti-ICE) political activity.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday March 15 2019, @02:17PM (4 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 15 2019, @02:17PM (#814765) Journal

    When the press is reviled for reporting what government, military and police officials are doing we need to pay attention. If what is reported is true, then anyone trying to stop it or label the reporters as "enmities of the state" is endangering the 1st Amendment for all of us.

    I agree that is true.

    The problem is that about 1/2 the population is willing to turn a blind eye to it because . . . . Trump. MAGA. On Many Sides. Etc.

    Which leads me to conclude that we have crossed the event horizon and that your first (unquoted) paragraph is absolutely true.

    I'm just waiting to watch the train crash.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 15 2019, @05:23PM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 15 2019, @05:23PM (#814895) Journal

    The problem is that about 1/2 the population is willing to turn a blind eye to it because . . . . Trump.

    Or Obama, prior to 2016. I think the best thing about Trump is that his support is unusually thin for a president. Sure, he has hardcore supporters, but they're not half of US voters. We actually have a better chance than usual to reverse some of these abuses.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 15 2019, @06:23PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 15 2019, @06:23PM (#814933)

      We actually have a better chance than usual to reverse some of these abuses.

      Reverse to what state? The state of abuse under Obama, Baby Bush, Clinton, Papa Bush, Reagan ...?

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday March 15 2019, @06:37PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 15 2019, @06:37PM (#814947) Journal

      Or Obama, prior to 2016.

      I could be biased. So I say that up front.

      As I seem to recall, not so many people were in favor of the state abuses when it was Obama doing them. Or George W doing them.

      With Trump, it is like a cult following. Just IMO. Don't dare criticize Trump. Trump can do absolutely no wrong.

      Again, just IMO from my own POV and biases.

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.