Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Sunday March 17 2019, @02:30AM   Printer-friendly

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2019/03/germany-considers-amendment-to-law-which-makes-it-illegal-to-run-a-tor-node-or-website/

On the 15th of March, the German Bundesrat (Federal Council) voted to amend the Criminal Code in relation to internet based services such as The onion router (Tor). The proposed law has been lambasted as being too vague, with privacy experts rightfully fearful that the law would be overapplied. The proposal, originating from the North Rhine-Westphalian Minister of Justice Peter Biesenbach, would amend and expand criminal law and make running a Tor node or website illegal and punishable by up to three years in prison. According to Zeit.de, if passed, the expansion of the Criminal Code would be used to punish anyone “who offers an internet-based service whose access and accessibility is limited by special technical precautions, and whose purpose or activity is directed to commit or promote certain illegal acts”.

Also at PC Mag & ZDNet

The proposal (German)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 17 2019, @03:34AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 17 2019, @03:34AM (#815670)

    Seems like we should simply make the actions illegal and not worry about what methods were used. Like banning knives to prevent stabbings, a law that targets the tool is easily misapplied, maliciously modified down the road, and often causes more problems than it fixes.

    "What’s worse is that the proposed changes are so vaguely worded that many other services that offer encryption could be seen as falling under this new law. While the proposal (full German text) does seem to have been written to target Tor hidden services which are dark net markets, the vague way that the proposal has been written makes it a very real possibility that other encrypted services such as messaging might be targeted under these new laws, as well."

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday March 17 2019, @04:04AM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday March 17 2019, @04:04AM (#815683) Journal

    Wrong target? I don't think they've missed their target, at all. The aim is censorship. This gives them one more tool to prevent double-bad think and double-bad speech, and to punish those who engage in double-bad speech. The censors know what they are doing.

    • (Score: 2) by driverless on Sunday March 17 2019, @07:21AM (2 children)

      by driverless (4770) on Sunday March 17 2019, @07:21AM (#815740)

      It's not just badly worded, it's atrociously worded to the point of being almost incomprehensible legal gibberish. Until someone publishes what the actual wording of the changed legal text is, it's almost impossible to figure out what it will or won't say.

      That said, German law is famous for its "gummiparagraphen", elastic paragraphs that sound over-reaching when you read them but are never applied in the strictest form in which they're written.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 17 2019, @08:44AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 17 2019, @08:44AM (#815759)

        tl;dr ... Summary "mission accomplished".

      • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Tuesday March 19 2019, @12:10AM

        by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday March 19 2019, @12:10AM (#816717) Homepage Journal

        Mind you, it's still clearer than many tech patents.