Human Contact Is Now a Luxury Good:
Screens used to be for the elite. Now avoiding them is a status symbol.
[...] Life for anyone but the very rich — the physical experience of learning, living and dying — is increasingly mediated by screens.
Not only are screens themselves cheap to make, but they also make things cheaper. Any place that can fit a screen in (classrooms, hospitals, airports, restaurants) can cut costs. And any activity that can happen on a screen becomes cheaper. The texture of life, the tactile experience, is becoming smooth glass.
The rich do not live like this. The rich have grown afraid of screens. They want their children to play with blocks, and tech-free private schools are booming. Humans are more expensive, and rich people are willing and able to pay for them. Conspicuous human interaction — living without a phone for a day, quitting social networks and not answering email — has become a status symbol.
All of this has led to a curious new reality: Human contact is becoming a luxury good.
As more screens appear in the lives of the poor, screens are disappearing from the lives of the rich. The richer you are, the more you spend to be offscreen.
I remember when the tag line for AT&T was Reach out and touch someone and it was portrayed as a good thing.
(Score: 2) by krishnoid on Tuesday March 26 2019, @07:49PM
Like pick and sort a huge variety of crops, assemble products designed in various US cities, such as Cupertino, pick items in warehouses for shipment to eager consumers, all the while surrounded by many others doing similar items. When they grow up, they'll even be able to assist in bottling recreational beverages [youtube.com].
Some of these places also forbid having technology, like cell phones with you! They say it's for security, but we all know it's most likely for the individuals' mental and social health. So it's not just for the rich and privileged.