For the first time ever, the FAA has approved the routine commercial use of drones to carry a product.
The WakeMed program will start by flying patients’ medical samples one-third of a mile (.5 kilometer) from a medical park to the main hospital building for lab testing at least six times a day five days a week, Matternet CEO Andreas Raptopoulos said in an interview. Vials of blood or other specimens will be loaded into a secure box and carried to a drone launching pad, where they will be fastened to the aircraft and flown to another building. He said the flights will technically be within sight of operators on either end of the route, and they are authorized to fly above people.
Samples are typically driven on the ground and the goal of this project is to cut down how long it typically takes to transport time-sensitive samples to their destination for testing.
the North Carolina program could expand to flying miles-long routes between Raleigh-area WakeMed buildings in the coming months, Raptopoulos said. He also said medical specimen flights could start at one or two more hospitals in other cities later in 2019.
Other approvals by the FAA have been for limited tests and demos.
North Carolina is one of nine sites participating in the FAA’s pilot program to accelerate integrating drones for new uses ranging from utility inspections to insurance claims. The test sites get leeway trying new innovations while working closely with the federal officials in charge of regulating the drones.
Can we get a black-helicopter drone that doesn't make any noise?
(Score: 2) by canopic jug on Wednesday March 27 2019, @05:50AM (6 children)
Drones in this case are just an expensive and noisy gimmick. They're not talking about rural Australia or rural Africa. However, there's close to zero chance that they'll grow up and install a pneumatic post system like hospitals used to have. So the neighborhood is going to be stuck with these buzzing annoyances disturbing the peace at all hours and, occasionally, falling out of the sky on their own.
I'm not favorably impressed by that, though it looks like the board and owners may be. Apparently they plan to expand the program to cover many more buildings. That's a problem but not the biggest one. The big deal here is that FAA approval for this will allow it in many other hazardous and foolish scenarios governed by people with more dollars than sense.
Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
(Score: 4, Informative) by c0lo on Wednesday March 27 2019, @06:32AM (3 children)
It it not impossible to find solutions for the buzzing.
E.g. [newscientist.com] [note the date: 2015]
So, yes, having almost quiet black-helicopter drones is possible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by canopic jug on Wednesday March 27 2019, @07:57AM (2 children)
Yes, but 30m is already more or less out of shotgun range...
Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday March 27 2019, @10:23AM
I'm at lost with this one.
Since they can be silent at 30m, do you suggest that the peace disturbance will be caused by shotguns shots and, occasionally, some "falling out of the sky on their own" because they fly out of shotgun range anyway (so they either must fall on their own or don't fall at all)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 1) by RandomFactor on Thursday March 28 2019, @01:49AM
Pretty close for skeet/birdshot. Of course you can extend that significantly with larger (better carrying) shot sizes, longer barrels, and 3.5" magnum shells
https://www.blog.thegunsandgearstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Game-Use.jpg [thegunsandgearstore.com]
Think how much do you have to hate yourself to shoot 10ga 3.5" Magnum loaded with 000?
В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday March 27 2019, @02:37PM
I think that there is another application for Drones. In addition to buzzing, annoying and disturbing the peace, which could still be part of their intended mission.
Drones could swoop down out of the sky and collect blood samples from unsuspecting pedestrians. Then fly those samples to the blood collecting mother ship.
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by urza9814 on Thursday March 28 2019, @01:37PM
A pneumatic system would probably be cheaper and easier for this test installation, as it sounds like they're practically flying the thing next door. But if it was expected to be viable by itself, it wouldn't be a test installation, it would just be an installation. Running pneumatic tubes across several miles as they plan to do with these drones in the future would be quite a bit more difficult (particularly if they don't own the property in between), and also a lot less flexible should they need to add or relocate facilities in the future.
As for the noise and falling drones concerns...that's up to the FAA to regulate. But given that these are being used to carry medical tests, I imagine one of the primary concerns would actually be the test samples getting into someone else's hands. Violating patient privacy is a pretty serious offense -- my company once faced millions of dollars *per day* in fines just because our developers (who do get annual HIPAA training and such) could view PHI in our production database, so if that kind of data gets into the hands of non-employees then the medical center is likely going to be facing a massive shitstorm. Even if they don't care about the drone falling on someone's head, they probably know better than to let the test samples drop, so those drones ought to be pretty robust. Also the possibility of falling vials of potentially infected blood...so many potential lawsuits here they'd better be damn careful. But that would be why they're testing it by flying the things next door for now...