Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 29 2019, @06:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the deep-seated-insecurities-and-paranoia dept.

Huawei's equipment poses 'significant' security risks, UK says:

The U.K. government warned on Thursday Huawei's telecommunications equipment raises "significant" security issues, posing a possible setback to the Chinese tech firm as it looks to build out 5G networks.

In 46-page report evaluating Huawei's security risks, British officials stopped short of calling for a ban of Huawei's 5G telecommunications equipment. But the assessment cited "underlying defects" in the company's software engineering and cybersecurity processes, citing "significantly increased risk to U.K. operators."

The findings give weight to warnings from U.S. officials who have argued Huawei's networking equipment could be used for espionage by the Chinese government. Huawei has repeatedly said it does not pose any risk and insists it would not share customer data with Beijing.

In a statement Thursday, Huawei said it takes the U.K. government's findings "very seriously."

"The issues identified in the OB (oversight board) report provide vital input for the ongoing transformation of our software engineering capabilities," a Huawei spokesperson said.

Other links:
Huawei Equipment Has Major Security Flaws, U.K. Says
Huawei's Perception Problem Deepens as U.K. Spies Identify Security Risks

So don't buy Huawei telecom equipment. Buy only US made telecom equipment. Because the NSA would never put bugs in for spying.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Shire on Saturday March 30 2019, @05:15PM

    by The Shire (5824) on Saturday March 30 2019, @05:15PM (#822408)

    The difference here is their processes were reviewed, found insecure, a list of things they had to change was created and agreed to by them, and then they didn't do it. So now not only are their security practices seriously in doubt, so are their oversight processes as well as any confidence that they do what they say they will do. Add to this all that they are beholden to their communist leaders who have a long history of pressuring chinese companies and employees to steal trade secrets and other information from other nations.

    That's not the sort of company you want providing hardware for your critical communications infrastructure.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2