Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 29 2019, @08:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-about-all-the-other-ones dept.

A major Greenland glacier that was one of the fastest shrinking ice and snow masses on Earth is growing again, a new NASA study finds.

The Jakobshavn (YA-cob-shawv-en) glacier around 2012 was retreating about 1.8 miles (3 kilometers) and thinning nearly 130 feet (almost 40 meters) annually. But it started growing again at about the same rate in the past two years, according to a study in Monday’s Nature Geoscience . Study authors and outside scientists think this is temporary.

“That was kind of a surprise. We kind of got used to a runaway system,” said Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland ice and climate scientist Jason Box. “The good news is that it’s a reminder that it’s not necessarily going that fast. But it is going.”

Box, who wasn’t part of the study, said Jakobshavn is “arguably the most important Greenland glacier because it discharges the most ice in the northern hemisphere. For all of Greenland, it is king.”

A natural cyclical cooling of North Atlantic waters likely caused the glacier to reverse course, said study lead author Ala Khazendar, a NASA glaciologist on the Oceans Melting Greenland (OMG) project. Khazendar and colleagues say this coincides with a flip of the North Atlantic Oscillation — a natural and temporary cooling and warming of parts of the ocean that is like a distant cousin to El Nino in the Pacific.

While this is “good news” on a temporary basis, this is bad news on the long term because it tells scientists that ocean temperature is a bigger player in glacier retreats and advances than previously thought, said NASA climate scientist Josh Willis, a study co-author. Over the decades the water has been and will be warming from man-made climate change, he said, noting that about 90 percent of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases goes into the oceans.

https://www.apnews.com/b19abfb0a0534b51925aa121806255a8


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Redundant) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 29 2019, @05:41PM (1 child)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 29 2019, @05:41PM (#821920) Journal

    The sunspot cycle is ELEVEN YEARS.

    They made all these same claims eleven years ago!

    Temperatures have consistently increased during the last six full cycles! [nasa.gov]

    The effect of sunspots has been repeatedly demonstrated to be minuscule compared to the greenhouse gas effect.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Redundant=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday March 30 2019, @11:51AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday March 30 2019, @11:51AM (#822300) Homepage
    YES, THAT'S WHY I SAID "Ask me again in about 6 or 7 years". We're at a predictable cyclic dip, I want to see what the next peak is in order to judge whether we're in a multi-cycle dip. The last peak was below average, if the next one is too then the last one wasn't an anomaly.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves