Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday March 30 2019, @08:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the you-had-me-at-helio dept.

According to new reasearch from Queen's and Aberystwyth Universities, the Sun's magnetic field is 10 times stronger than previously believed.

Studying a particularly strong solar flare allowed researchers to quantify the sun's magnetic field more precisely than in the past.

Speaking about the accuracy of the results, Dr. Kuridze, a Research Fellow at Aberystwyth, stated:

"This is the first time we have been able to measure accurately the magnetic field of the coronal loops, the building blocks of the sun's magnetic corona, which such a level of accuracy."

The weak signal reaching Earth and limitations of equipment have hindered previous measurements.

There was also serendipity involved:

Over a 10-day period in September 2017, Dr. Kuridze studied an active area on the sun's surface which the team knew to be particularly volatile.

However, the telescope used can only focus on 1% of the sun's surface at any given time. As luck would have it, Dr. Kuridze was focused on exactly the right area and at the right time when the solar flare erupted.

Now I'm not saying what caused this increase in measured magnetism, but some might say there was some field filching going on. It has been reported that the Earth's magnetic field is weakening 10 times faster than previously estimated.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Rupert Pupnick on Saturday March 30 2019, @11:52AM (1 child)

    by Rupert Pupnick (7277) on Saturday March 30 2019, @11:52AM (#822301) Journal

    It doesn’t really inspire a lot of confidence in astrophysics for their estimates or model to be this far off for this long. And what is it about the measurement methodology that requires these rarely occurring conditions to get an accurate measurement? If they’re only looking at the “right” 1% to draw this conclusion, how do they know it’s not an anomaly?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 30 2019, @02:02PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 30 2019, @02:02PM (#822339)

    I wouldn't be too worried. The Ancient Order of the Vairagi Adepts have not expressed official concern.