Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday March 30 2019, @05:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the police dept.

Man Gets 20 Years for Deadly "Swatting" Hoax:

Tyler Barriss has shown little remorse for the death of Andrew Finch.

Tyler Barriss, whose hoax call to Wichita police led to the shooting death of an innocent man, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison, the Associated Press reports. The sentence in Kansas federal court is a stark reminder of the serious consequences of the deadly prank called "swatting."

The December 2017 death of Andrew Finch began with an online feud over a Call of Duty game. Casey Viner, then around 18 years old, allegedly recruited Barriss to "swat" the Wichita home of Shane Gaskill, who was about 19. Barriss called Wichita police pretending to be a deranged man with a gun holding members of his family hostage, giving what he believed was the target's address.

As Barriss expected, the police responded by dispatching a SWAT team. But Gaskill lied to Barriss about where he lived. As a result, police surrounded a home occupied by the Finch family, which had nothing to do with the online dispute.

When 28-year-old Andrew Finch opened his front door, a police officer shot him. The officer later said he saw Finch reaching for his waist and feared he had a gun. In reality, Finch was unarmed.

[...] In April, the incarcerated Barriss briefly gained access to the Internet—and he took the opportunity to demonstrate that he had learned nothing from his time behind bars.

"All right, now who was talking shit?" he tweeted on April 6, 2018. "Your ass is about to get swatted."

[...] Prosecutors decided not to charge the police officer who shot Finch.

With good behavior, he could get something like 30 months off his sentence. Something tells me he might have difficulty with that "good behavior" part.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by arslan on Sunday March 31 2019, @09:31PM

    by arslan (3462) on Sunday March 31 2019, @09:31PM (#822850)

    So... everyone bagging the prick, rightfully so and he got what he deserved. But that isn't just the problem here. If someone can prank the police to do shite like this, isn't there something seriously wrong with the way the police are screening their channels?

    Am I missing something or is it that kill first and ask questions later is the modus op. for the police in the US, so they don't really need to bother with screening? I mean how hard was it for the police to see the originator of the phone call against the address to dispatch their death squad to?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2