Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Monday April 01 2019, @10:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-got-colorectal-cancer-from-YouTube-comments dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

High-fructose corn syrup boosts intestinal tumor growth in mice

First, Yun and her colleagues generated a mouse model of early-stage colon cancer where APC gene is deleted. "APC is a gatekeeper in colorectal cancer. Deleting this protein is like removing the breaks of a car. Without it, normal intestinal cells neither stop growing nor die, forming early stage tumors called polyps. More than 90 percent of colorectal cancer patients have this type of APC mutation," Yun said.

Using this mouse model of the disease, the team tested the effect of consuming sugar-sweetened water on tumor development. The sweetened water was 25 percent high-fructose corn syrup, which is the main sweetener of sugary drinks people consume. High-fructose corn syrup consists of glucose and fructose at a 45:55 ratio.

When the researchers provided the sugary drink in the water bottle for the APC-model mice to drink at their will, mice rapidly gained weight in a month. To prevent the mice from being obese and mimic humans' daily consumption of one can of soda, the researchers gave the mice a moderate amount of sugary water orally with a special syringe once a day. After two months, the APC-model mice receiving sugary water did not become obese, but developed tumors that were larger and of higher-grade than those in model mice treated with regular water.

[...] The team then investigated the mechanism by which this sugar promoted tumor growth. They discovered that the APC-model mice receiving modest high-fructose corn syrup had high amounts of fructose in their colons. "We observed that sugary drinks increased the levels of fructose and glucose in the colon and blood, respectively and that tumors could efficiently take up both fructose and glucose via different routes."

Using cutting-edge technologies to trace the fate of glucose and fructose in tumor tissues, the team showed that fructose was first chemically changed and this process then enabled it to efficiently promote the production of fatty acids, which ultimately contribute to tumor growth.

[...] To determine whether fructose metabolism or increased fatty acid production was responsible for sugar-induced tumor growth, the researchers modified APC-model mice to lack genes coding for enzymes involved in either fructose metabolism or fatty acid synthesis. One group of APC-model mice lacked an enzyme KHK, which is involved in fructose metabolism, and another group lacked enzyme FASN, which participates in fatty acid synthesis. They found that mice lacking either of these genes did not develop larger tumors, unlike APC-model mice, when fed the same modest amounts of high-fructose corn syrup.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Redundant) by ilPapa on Tuesday April 02 2019, @04:31AM (3 children)

    by ilPapa (2366) on Tuesday April 02 2019, @04:31AM (#823442) Journal

    HFCS is barely different from normal sugar

    How would you know, except from reading HCFS industry press releases? That corn syrup doesn't make itself, you know. Who the fuck knows what goes into it? And how much Roundup is used on that corn (which is now shown to be a carcinogen)?

    --
    You are still welcome on my lawn.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -2  
       Troll=1, Redundant=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by FatPhil on Tuesday April 02 2019, @06:50AM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday April 02 2019, @06:50AM (#823491) Homepage
    Because you can measure what's in it.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 1, Redundant) by ilPapa on Tuesday April 02 2019, @02:40PM (1 child)

      by ilPapa (2366) on Tuesday April 02 2019, @02:40PM (#823627) Journal

      Because you can measure what's in it.

      If they're the same, why does the body process them differently?

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2682989/ [nih.gov]

      Both sugar and HFCS are bad for you. This is not in question.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376619 [nih.gov]

      --
      You are still welcome on my lawn.
      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday April 02 2019, @03:35PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday April 02 2019, @03:35PM (#823641) Homepage
        You, sir, are a high quality fucking idiot. As you've wasted my time having to hit you with a clue-by-four.

        Fructose and Glucose, what you "they're differnt things" link is referring to, are different things.

        HFCS is an almost-equal mixture of fructose and glucose.
        Sucrose ("sugar") is an equal mixture of fructose and glucose.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves