David Baltimore: I fully agree — and the whole group of us involved in the summits agree — that we're not ready to be doing germline modification of humans, if we ever are. You might say, "Well, that's a moratorium," and, in a sense, it is. I don't have a big argument about that.
But the important point is to be flexible going forward. That's what's wrong with a moratorium. It's that the idea gets fixed in people's minds that we're making firm statements about what we don't want to do and for how long we don't want to do it.
With a science that's moving forward as rapidly as this science is, you want to be able to adapt to new discoveries, new opportunities and new understandings. To make rules is probably not a good idea.
What's a good idea is to be on top of a changing environment and to adjust to it as time goes by. And that's both an ethical environment and a practical environment of the mechanics of gene editing.
The Clone Wars, begun they have.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Snotnose on Wednesday April 03 2019, @11:26PM (1 child)
Who is going to ban it? The US? Good luck getting anyone else (*cough* China) to care. The UN? Good luck getting anyone else (*cough* everyone else) to follow it.
It's gonna happen, banning it in the US just means the US will be behind.
When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 04 2019, @05:28AM
One does not just ignore the UN's strongly worded letters.