Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday April 05 2019, @11:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the good-luck-with-that dept.

Morningstar:

Freight railroads generally have operated the same way for more than a century: They wait for cargo and leave when customers are ready. Now railroads want to run more like commercial airlines, where departure times are set. Factories, farms, mines or mills need to be ready or miss their trips.

Called "precision-scheduled railroading," or PSR, this new concept is cascading through the industry. Under pressure from Wall Street to improve performance, Norfolk Southern and other large U.S. freight carriers, including Union Pacific Corp. and Kansas City Southern, are trying to revamp their networks to use fewer trains and hold them to tighter schedules. The moves have sparked a stock rally that has added tens of billions of dollars to railroad values in the past six months as investors anticipate lower costs and higher profits.

Calling all Railroad Tycoons...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Saturday April 06 2019, @03:48PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Saturday April 06 2019, @03:48PM (#825407)

    Thank you! A non-troll AC. I started a lengthy reply, involving coupler slack (which is intentionally up to 1.5 feet per coupler, or 3 feet per coupling), car weights, collision forces, brake force variation, etc., but deleted the lengthy reply (because I don't have enough time to do more research / calculations) after learning 2 things:

    1) collision force calculations are complex and I'm not sure if a simple 100:1 -> 0.01 g. You can certainly do a simple calculation based on conservation of momentum, but the peak force will depend on energy-absorption by various structures which will crumple. For example, many of the large locomotives have a pair of stairs in the very front. The 10,000 HP 45 ton motor won't crumple much, but the point is that anything at all will greatly reduce the peak impulse of the collision. If the locomotive is moving relatively slowly, and there's appreciable crumple "stuff", the g force will be less because it's happening over some amount of time.

    But neglecting the obviously short duration of crumpling, you still have:

    2) car coupling compression is a total unknown. They could be in full stretch, full compression, or unknown, so we'll never know the full peak energy of impact of a 100 car 14,000 ton train hitting a 45 ton motor unless we put accelerometers in locomotives.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2