Climate Change: 'Magic Bullet' Carbon Solution Takes Big Step:
A technology that removes carbon dioxide from the air has received significant backing from major fossil fuel companies.
British Columbia-based Carbon Engineering has shown that it can extract CO2 in a cost-effective way.
It has now been boosted by $68m in new investment from Chevron, Occidental and coal giant BHP.
[...]CO2 is a powerful warming gas but there's not a lot of it in the atmosphere - for every million molecules of air, there are 410 of CO2.
While the CO2 is helping to drive temperatures up around the world, the comparatively low concentrations make it difficult to design efficient machines to remove the gas.
Carbon Engineering's process is all about sucking in air and exposing it to a chemical solution that concentrates the CO2. Further refinements mean the gas can be purified into a form that can be stored or utilised as a liquid fuel.
[...]Carbon Engineering's barn-sized installation has a large fan in the middle of the roof which draws in air from the atmosphere.
It then comes into contact with a hydroxide-based chemical solution. Certain hydroxides react with carbon dioxide, reversibly binding to the CO2 molecule. When the CO2 in the air reacts with the liquid, it forms a carbonate mixture. That is then treated with a slurry of calcium hydroxide to change it into solid form; the slurry helps form tiny pellets of calcium carbonate.
The chalky calcium carbonate pellets are then treated at a high temperature of about 900C, with the pellets decomposing into a CO2 stream and calcium oxide.
After any water lingering in the concentrated CO2 is removed, the result can be converted into a fuel:
The captured CO2 is mixed with hydrogen that's made from water and green electricity. It's then passed over a catalyst at 900C to form carbon monoxide. Adding in more hydrogen to the carbon monoxide turns it into what's called synthesis gas.
Finally a Fischer-Tropsch process turns this gas into a synthetic crude oil. Carbon Engineering says the liquid can be used in a variety of engines without modification.
The question then becomes are people going to look at this development and think there is no need to reduce their use of fossil fuels and/or delay the transition to renewable power sources?
Prev: https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/06/13/025232&from=rss
Related: https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/08/20/0148258
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/10/29/1532257&from=rss
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=19/02/28/0231247
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Monday April 08 2019, @09:21PM
Well, the problem at this point is pretty clearly that we need to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. So "carbon neutral", while better than "here, have some more carbon" isn't great.
Seems like the way to go to me. Go to EV's ASAP, which are energy source agnostic, get off petroleum and other significant present-day atmospheric CO2 contributors (solar, nuclear, hydro, wind, tidal, geothermal, basically just about anything but burning stuff.) Hydrogen's basically a battery — you can only make it by shoveling in more energy than you're going to get out of it, and it's both difficult to transport and to store, so not all that great, really, barring a huge new infrastructure investment.
I keep hoping (and being disappointed) that one of these ultracap companies or some brilliant researcher somewhere will break the high-voltage barrier for ultra-thin dielectrics, so we can store enough energy in ultracaps to get past batteries and their nasty combo of toxic chemistry and very short service lifetimes.
Eestor [eestorcorp.com] was trumpeting all about that, but appears to have either been scamming or simply unable to do what they thought they could do (and yeah, I'm aware of their continuous trumpeting of independent test results... but where's the HV / high farad capacitor, fellas? Huh? Huh?)
--
What I if told you
you read the previous line wrong