Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 08 2019, @02:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the universal-solvent dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

Google dissolves AI ethics board just one week after forming it

Google today disclosed that it has dissolved a short-lived, external advisory board designed to monitor its use of artificial intelligence, following a week of controversy regarding the company’s selection of members. The decision, reported first today by Vox, is largely due to outcry over the board’s inclusion of Heritage Foundation president Kay Coles James, a noted conservative figure who has openly espoused anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and, through the Heritage Foundation, fought efforts to extend rights to transgender individuals and to combat climate change.

The advisory board, called the Advanced Technology External Advisory Council (ATEAC), included a number of prominent academics in fields ranging from AI and philosophy to psychology and robotics. But it also included those with policy backgrounds, like James and members of former US presidential administrations.

The goal was ostensibly to inform Google’s AI work and to ensure it was following its AI Principles, set out last year by CEO Sundar Pichai after revelations the company was participating in a Pentagon drone project that made use of the company’s machine learning research. Google has since said it will stop working on the project and has pledged never to develop AI weaponry or work on any project or application of AI that violates “internationally accepted norms” or “widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.”

“It’s become clear that in the current environment, ATEAC can’t function as we wanted,” a Google spokesperson told The Verge. “So we’re ending the council and going back to the drawing board. We’ll continue to be responsible in our work on the important issues that AI raises, and will find different ways of getting outside opinions on these topics.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 09 2019, @04:56AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 09 2019, @04:56AM (#826550)

    Corporations use one of the toilets that are intended for various subsets of the other 87 (or was it 89?) genders.

    Perhaps you had missed the memo, but it is widely known that the number of genders is over 9000.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday April 09 2019, @02:20PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 09 2019, @02:20PM (#826758) Journal

    You see! That! Right there! Is why we so desperately need a new Federal Department of Gender! How can we keep up with this without the government's help! Who will assign the various gender codes that all government forms will accept to indicate gender? How will software developers have a standard source to go to for the official list of genders to use in their software products?

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.