Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday April 09 2019, @09:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the why-not-ask-the-cowardly-lion? dept.

Apple's 'courage' to remove the headphone jack has created a brave new world

It was barely two years ago when we lamented the loss of the headphone jack on the iPhone. The iPhone 7 had just arrived with a gorgeous jet black color, a solid-state home button, and a dongle in place of the 3.5mm headphone jack. At the iPhone 7 introduction, Apple VP Phil Schiller talked about having the "courage" to make the change, to leave the headphone jack behind.

At the time it was kind of cringe-worthy. Rather than try to convince the audience of the benefits of wireless charging or the annoyances of wired earphones, Schiller basically told the audience that they might not understand now, but one day they will. You could hear the snickers in the auidence when he said that removing the headphone jack required the "courage to move on and do something new that betters all of us." It sounded ridiculous. All we could see was the inconvenience ahead.

But you know what? He was right.

It might have sounded like the reality distortion field on steroids, but Apple's decision to remove the headphone jack from its most popular product wasn't a flippant design whim. It was the start of a new strategy that would bring convenience, simplicity, and downright delight.

The move led to courageous sales of AirPods.

See also: Poll: Looking back now, did Apple exhibit 'courage' in removing the headphone jack from iPhones?

Related: New Moto Z Omits Analog Headphone Jack; Adds Moto Mods
Bring Back the Headphone Jack: Why USB-C Audio Still Doesn't Work
Apple on the Decline


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 09 2019, @09:56AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 09 2019, @09:56AM (#826635)

    For listening to music? sure.

    However, Bluetooth doesn't allow me to put my phone in a pocket or bag when it's freezing/raining, while taking a call on a headset and have decent quality audio and microphone.
    Maybe this is changing, but the BT profiles allowing for high-quality audio did not support microphone, and the BT profiles for microphone had terrible audio quality both for listening and for microphone. See:
    https://www.howtogeek.com/354321/why-bluetooth-headsets-are-terrible-on-windows-pcs/ [howtogeek.com]

    So if you want to use your phone as a ipod, sure BT is fine other than needing to charge (and replace in the long run) the batteries of yet another piece of equipment.
    For actually making calls, BT sucks unless you live in a place where it's always warm and sunny.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by EvilSS on Tuesday April 09 2019, @03:52PM

    by EvilSS (1456) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 09 2019, @03:52PM (#826844)

    However, Bluetooth doesn't allow me to put my phone in a pocket or bag when it's freezing/raining, while taking a call on a headset and have decent quality audio and microphone.

    Airpods. Seriously. I went through half a dozen wireless BT earbuds before I gave in and tried them. Due to my job I'm on the phone all the damn time. The audio quality of the airpods is better than the average earbuds (won't compete with my Shures, but compared to the default buds with most phones, they are a step up) and the mic quality is great. I hate how stupid they look, but I can't find anything that beats them for listening and making calls.