Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday April 10 2019, @08:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the donut-of-doom dept.

Submitted via IRC for boru

Event Horizon Telescope

The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) — a planet-scale array of eight ground-based radio telescopes forged through international collaboration — was designed to capture images of a black hole. Today, in coordinated press conferences across the globe, EHT researchers reveal that they have succeeded, unveiling the first direct visual evidence of a supermassive black hole and its shadow.

This breakthrough was announced today in a series of six papers published in a special issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters. The image reveals the black hole at the center of Messier 87, a massive galaxy in the nearby Virgo galaxy cluster. This black hole resides 55 million light-years from Earth and has a mass 6.5 billion times that of the Sun.

The EHT links telescopes around the globe to form an Earth-sized virtual telescope with unprecedented sensitivity and resolution. The EHT is the result of years of international collaboration, and offers scientists a new way to study the most extreme objects in the Universe predicted by Einstein's general relativity during the centennial year of the historic experiment that first confirmed the theory.

[...] This research was presented in a series of six papers published today in a special issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters, along with a Focus Issue:

Press release images in higher resolution (4000x2330 pixels) can be found here in PNG (16-bit), and JPG (8-bit) format. The highest-quality image (7416x4320 pixels, TIF, 16-bit, 180 Mb) can be obtained from repositories of our partners, NSF and ESO. A summary of latest press and media resources can be found on this page.

Also at Ars Technica.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:38AM (14 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:38AM (#827832) Homepage
    It's spinning.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:59AM (13 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:59AM (#827836) Journal

    "E pur si muove" and "πάντα ῥεῖ"

    And it just happens to spin around an axis that's oriented straight to the Solar system, for the benefit of human astronomers.
    The same astronomers which observed a polar relativistic jet going on an angle and a distribution of star orbit velocities in which one side is speeding towards and the other side speeding away from Earth (heck of a misalignment between the angular momentum of the black hole gobbling those stars and the gobbled stars).

    I mean... that's hell of a luck for the astronomers, don't you think?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 11 2019, @11:49AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 11 2019, @11:49AM (#827848)

      what would be really cool is if no matter (no pun intended) from where or which angle you observe and take a picture of a blackhole it ALWAYS looks like a ring O_o

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 11 2019, @12:34PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 11 2019, @12:34PM (#827869) Journal

        If you ever look down that relativistic polar jet close enough, try to use a single eye.
        That way, you may keep the other eye to look later into a laser

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Thursday April 11 2019, @03:31PM (10 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday April 11 2019, @03:31PM (#828017) Homepage
      > And it just happens to spin around an axis that's oriented straight to the Solar system, for the benefit of human astronomers.

      Nope, not at all. Firstly, where did you get that "fact" from? Noone's stated it, or anything like it, so I can only imagine it's come out of some other dark hole.

      One pointing towards us would be firing a high energy beam of x rays right at us. And we know it isn't as we can see that high energy beam of X rays illuminating some path off elsewhere in space, and you should know that as it was one of Hubble's most lauded photos when it was captured in high resolution.

      Additionally, according to the simulations of the mathematical models, one viewed aslant would look that way too. That's why the astronomers are calling this darkness the "shadow", rather than anything else. It's an indirect effect of the actual thing there, not the thing itself. The thing itself is invisible. As is the event horizon surrounding it. And not just invisible - so perturbing of space-time that it doesn't let anything, anywhere, appear to be from the same direction as it. And because this is actual space-time being perturbed, you can even claim it is not even "behind" any more - it's "behind and to the side", as space has been bent to the side, there literally is no "behind".

      It's so perturbing of space-time that it can even make some hot bright thing in front of it, and below it from the viewer's perspective, appear as if that hot bright thing is behind it and above it (simple - the light flies away from the viewer, grazes near the event horizon, and in so doing gets a gravitational slingshot back towards the viewer). That's why the mathematical model simulation images contain loads and loads of messily superimposed circular arcs - you're allowed to loop around many times before escaping - and no orbits are stable, even for light beams.

      GR and black holes in particular are weird, it's fine to not understand them, but that doesn't mean it's fine to dismiss the scientists who are able to make predictive statements before experimentation and then see those statements come true to the satisfaction of many other competing scientists.

      Unless you think it's all a conspiracy, and there's just a monkey with a gold spray-can locked away in some Cambridge basement. From some of the "artist's impressions" I've seen on NASA press releases, sometimes I think that might be the case...
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 11 2019, @09:58PM (9 children)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 11 2019, @09:58PM (#828303) Journal

        Nope, not at all. Firstly, where did you get that "fact" from?

        From the fact that the central hole looks almost perfectly circular.
        Suppose that the hole would be rotating along an axis perfectly orthogonal on the observation direction. Would you still see the black perfect circle in the middle? If so, why?

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:38PM (8 children)

          by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:38PM (#828336) Homepage
          I presume the edge-on case would be more prominantly the accretion disk in front of the horizon blocking the view of the mess in the middle, but still, above and below that, I would expect a black near-semicircle (depending on spin) surrounded by a hot halo consisting of the firewall part of the accretion disk on the "far" side that has been bent into view to that appears to be above (or below) the event horizon.
          --
          Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
          • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:47PM (7 children)

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 11 2019, @10:47PM (#828346) Journal

            And if the accretion disk(/rotation axis) is at an angle with the observation direction, wouldn't there be some of the accretion disks visible above the "mess in the middle"?

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
            • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday April 11 2019, @11:56PM (6 children)

              by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday April 11 2019, @11:56PM (#828389) Homepage
              So now in response to my:
              "the accretion disk on the "far" side that has been bent into view to that appears to be above..."
              you respond:
              "wouldn't there be some of the accretion disks visible above"

              OK, there's a single letter typo, but really, you're taking the fucking piss now, you really are.
              --
              Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
              • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday April 12 2019, @12:35AM

                by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 12 2019, @12:35AM (#828405) Journal

                Ok, mate, that's my last message on the topic.
                Look at the Saturn's rings, you see them going in front of the circle that is the planet itself.

                Now, go back to the black hole and, no matter from which side of the black hole (far or near) the light from the accretion disk come from, I would expect to see at least a band of light crossing that perfect circle. Yeah, Ok, maybe that band is not uniform in light intensity, but to my mind it should be something
                In extreme, if the accretion disc is thick enough, I'd expect it to obscure a part of the horizon circle and transform its image into a distorted ellipse.

                So far, the best explanation I got is this [soylentnews.org], positing that one won't see the accretion disc shape, but it's light after being scrambled by grav lensing and (maybe) frame drag, and that scrambled light will mostly coming from the circumference (i.e. the light coming straight from the accretion disc itself is weaker and swamped by the light that escapes the 'scrambling').

                --
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
              • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday April 12 2019, @06:54AM (4 children)

                by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 12 2019, @06:54AM (#828518) Journal
                --
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
                • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday April 12 2019, @07:32AM (3 children)

                  by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday April 12 2019, @07:32AM (#828521) Homepage
                  First link is fantastic - thanks for posting. The animation is indeed kinda trippy. If you single step through it, you will see several features I mentioned, such as the donut shape still being quite clearly donutty even when the axis is tipped quite a long way (though it's not exactly obvious where the axis is relative to the orthogonal ones marked is), and part of that is because there's always some part of a perfectly circular halo visible above and below the centre even when we're orthogonal to the axis.

                  The thing where I was wrong was about those oblique angles, and apparently you can see "through" where the event horizon is. My thinking was that any light path from my eye directly to the direction of event horizon would have no way of not going into the event horizon, and thus disappearing. However, the concepts of "directly to", "the direction", and "going into" stop meaning quite what you'd normally expect when space and time (this might be a time issue I've not considered) are so distorted. Even "where the event horizon is" begins to lose its meaning, as it's somewhat relative.
                  --
                  Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
                  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday April 12 2019, @07:46AM (2 children)

                    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday April 12 2019, @07:46AM (#828523) Homepage
                    The second vid basically says exactly what I've been saying all along, just with some numbers on it. It's not quite the appropriate model for a spinning black hole, but he claimed to have one about that, I'll try to hunt that out.
                    --
                    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
                    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday April 12 2019, @08:02AM (1 child)

                      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 12 2019, @08:02AM (#828527) Journal

                      It was the grav lensing that I was missing from the picture, which is first degree approx of why the accretion disc will show very weakly represented in the number of pixels on the screen and pushed away from the 'face' of the black hole.

                      (the bright side of our whole kerkuffle: pays to be stubbornly wrong on purpose in the search of a better answer. Sometimes, at least. Apologies for annoying you)

                      --
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
                      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday April 13 2019, @08:24AM

                        by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Saturday April 13 2019, @08:24AM (#828907) Homepage
                        Appology accepted, sorry for being snippy.
                        --
                        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves