Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday April 15 2019, @12:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the thank-you-jesus! dept.

For the first time "No Religion" has topped a survey of Americans' religious identity, according to a new analysis by a political scientist. The non-religious edged out Catholics and evangelicals in the long-running General Social Survey.

Ryan Burge, a political scientist at Eastern Illinois University and a Baptist pastor, found that 23.1% of Americans now claim no religion.

Catholics came in at 23.0%, and evangelicals were at 22.5%.

The three groups remain within the margin of error of each other though, making it a statistical tie. Over 2,000 people were interviewed in person for the survey.

[...] "We are seeing the rise of a generation of Americans who are hungry for facts and curious about the world," she says.

There are now as many Americans who claim no religion as there are evangelicals and Catholics, a survey finds

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday April 15 2019, @02:41PM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Monday April 15 2019, @02:41PM (#829836) Homepage
    I mostly enjoyed Niall's telly programs, I had a few issues with his approach, and my g/f who's better read in history and social anthropology than me (by 3 degrees) had incomparably more issues. Not necessarily in what was actually being said, but what was being missed out. I wish I could remember specific examples, but it was several years ago. It was still on the "interesting watch" side of the divide, rather than "poor", though, don't get me wrong.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Monday April 15 2019, @03:37PM

    I mostly enjoyed Niall's telly programs, I had a few issues with his approach, and my g/f who's better read in history and social anthropology than me (by 3 degrees) had incomparably more issues. Not necessarily in what was actually being said, but what was being missed out. I wish I could remember specific examples, but it was several years ago. It was still on the "interesting watch" side of the divide, rather than "poor", though, don't get me wrong.

    Honestly, I haven't seen the television programs. That said, I'm sure plenty was left out. After all, it was just two programs.

    I'm currently in the middle of reading the book, which also glosses over a lot, but I'm sure it's better than the television bit.

    I put the links to the TV stuff because, sadly, so many folks just don't read books anymore.

    As I mentioned in my comment, the links I provided are accessible starting points not intended to be really comprehensive.

    Guns, Germs and Steel is likewise not comprehensive and focuses on specific historical and technological areas which are both interesting and provides some context around western domination of the world.

    Both Ferguson and Diamond attempt (and somewhat successfully -- at least in their books) to elucidate how the west managed to dominate most of the rest of the world starting around the fifteenth century. They're attempting to address specific areas of western culture, technology and political thought using a narrative format that (IMHO) makes it more accessible to the lay person.

    Likewise, The Western Tradition, which is also not meant to be comprehensive, gives a broad brush across the last 7-10,000 years. It does (again, IMHO) give a really nice overview (in 52 ~30 minute episodes) of western civilization. As a broad, but shallow exploration, it's rather well done.

    I'm sure your g/f would agree that if you really want a deep dive into the history of western civilization, you'll spend years reading dozens, if not hundreds, of books of the academic variety.

    Based on your usage (not just in this comment, but others I've seen as well), I suspect you're in the UK (or if not, are from there). I'm not sure how much history is taught there, but in the US, history education is abysmal. That's why I suggested these works. Shamefully, most Americans have a really poor understanding of the cultural, political and philosophical underpinnings of our society. More's the pity.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr