Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday April 16 2019, @06:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the they're-screwed dept.

Supreme Court Dances Around The F-Word With Real Potential Financial Consequences

Dirty words make it to the U.S. Supreme Court only occasionally. One of those occasions came Monday, in a case involving a clothing line named "FUCT." The issue is whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office acted unconstitutionally when it refused to grant trademark protection to the brand name. And, for the justices, the immediate problem was how to discuss the the F-word without actually saying it.

The "FUCT" clothing line, created by designer Eric Brunetti, is mainly hoodies, loose pants, shorts and T-shirts, all with the brand name prominently displayed.

[...] Brunetti's case got a boost two years ago when the Supreme Court ruled that an Asian-American band calling itself "The Slants" could not be denied trademark protection. The trademark office had turned the band down, because it deemed the name racially "disparaging," but the court said the denial amounted to unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.

Dealing with the brand name "FUCT" proved a bit more daunting in the Supreme Court chamber Monday. Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart referred to the brand name as a "profane past participle form of a well-known word of profanity and perhaps the paradigmatic word of profanity in our language."

Also at Reuters.

Previously: Two Unanimous SCOTUS Victories for Free Speech


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 16 2019, @07:57PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 16 2019, @07:57PM (#830569)

    something is wrong w/ the world.
    now we have to deal with another requirment in our quest to make a axiomatic system self consistant: it's elements can not be assembled so as to offend ... aka ... curse. *sigh* this shit is getting difficult.
    srsly, tho ... letter combos that describe a fruit can be ... throw into the legal system grinder and now C9MMON and wrongly typed curse and swear words can be too?
    *sigh* i suppose it will all get old and the only people really getting shafted is "the society for a pure a consistant curse words dictionnary" 'cause everything broadcasted will get old or turn into ... sand... ala streusand effect ^_^