Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday April 18 2019, @12:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the kip dept.

Sleep Myths 'Damaging Your Health':

Widely held myths about sleep are damaging our health and our mood, as well as shortening our lives, say researchers.

A team at New York University trawled the internet to find the most common claims about a good night's kip[*].

Then, in a study published in the journal Sleep Health, they matched the claims to the best scientific evidence.

They hope that dispelling sleep myths will improve people's physical and mental health and well-being.

So, how many are you guilty of?

Myth 1 - You can cope on less than five hours' sleep
[...]Myth 2 - Alcohol before bed boosts your sleep
[...]Myth 3 - Watching TV in bed helps you relax
[...]Myth 4 - If you're struggling to sleep, stay in bed
[...]Myth 5 - Hitting the snooze button
[...]Myth 6 - Snoring is always harmless

Another myth is that one should have 7-8 hours of continuous sleep. There is ample evidence that this is a relatively recent phenomenon. Consider embracing a bi-phasic or two-sleep schedule, instead.

I was at first concerned when I found myself waking after 3, 4 or even 5 hours sleep -- I became worried that I might be trending into insomnia. Instead, knowing this is a "thing", I just accept it, now. I get up for an hour or so. Use the bathroom. Maybe do some light reading (SoylentNews FTW!). And, after an hour or so, am ready to go back to bed for the rest of my night's sleep. Naps can be helpful, too.

How well do you sleep?

*kip: chiefly British : sleep, nap


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 18 2019, @04:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 18 2019, @04:52PM (#831706)

    In the 1980s I had both green and amber monochrome displays before color monitors of reasonable quality became more affordable.

    Tried the SN VT220 red/orange for awhile, but went back to VT100 green. Set for something that looks about like 12 point text, the green reminds me of my Ann Arbor terminal with 60(?) text lines in portrait display--running on a CP/M Z-80 system. On my laptop the text is much sharper than the Ann Arbor CRT.