Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday April 23 2019, @09:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the they-already-have-the-acronym-thing-down dept.

At the April 13th meeting of the American Physical Society, students from Drake University in Iowa presented their MISSFIT (Magneto-Ionization Spacecraft Shield for Interplanetary Travel) design that uses superconducting magnets to generate a magnetic shield protecting spacecraft against cosmic radiation while in transit.

The design incorporates both passive and active magnetic shielding similar to the Earth's ionosphere.

With help from a small NASA grant through the Iowa Space Grant Consortium, experiments are already underway on the passive shielding, which could protect astronauts from high-energy gamma-rays that a magnetic shield can’t stop. The hope, said Lorien MacEnulty, a junior at Drake and a member of the team, is to solve a key safety problem that's delayed an eventual NASA mission to Mars: long-term exposure to interplanetary radiation.

Right now, the students are experimenting with a number of radiation-blocking fabrics that might be light enough to mount on a spacecraft.

"We expose [the fabrics] to radiation," MacEnulty told Live Science. "Then we count how many particles make it through the layers of fabric."

The active shielding on the other hand assumes that any future spacecraft would be 'roughly cylindrical' with room at either end for a superconducting magnet ring powered by nuclear reactors.

Those magnets wouldn't divert gamma-rays. But they would cause charged alpha particles — another component of cosmic rays that could strike the spacecraft and emit X-rays — to move toward the ends of the spacecraft, which would be capped by two bubbles of material filled with a mixture of ionized gas that mimics Earth's ionosphere.

As the alpha particles zoom through this ionized gas, they would lose energy in a process similar to the one that produces auroras in the ionosphere near Earth's own North and South Poles.

Many questions remain unanswered in the design and the students are already showing their maturity as researchers by planning out what will require investigation and study over the next several years.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23 2019, @10:56PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23 2019, @10:56PM (#834080)

    "Nuclear Powered Superconducting Magnetic Cosmic Radiation Shielding for Marsonauts"

    That has got to be the worst movie title ever.

  • (Score: 2, Funny) by RandomFactor on Tuesday April 23 2019, @11:02PM

    by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 23 2019, @11:02PM (#834085) Journal

    It is missing "in Spaaaace!" at the end to really put a bow on it.

    --
    В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23 2019, @11:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23 2019, @11:05PM (#834088)

    "Anonymous Netizen Whinges About Article Tiitles Like 'Nuclear Powered Superconducting Magnetic Cosmic Radiation Shielding for Marsonauts'"

    That has got to be the worst movie title ever.

    There. FTFY.

  • (Score: 2) by Magic Oddball on Wednesday April 24 2019, @12:41AM (1 child)

    by Magic Oddball (3847) on Wednesday April 24 2019, @12:41AM (#834132) Journal

    Even just on its own, the cutesy pseudo-term "Marsonauts" deserves to be put on a nuclear-powered rocket and shot at the sun for the sake of humanity.

    • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Wednesday April 24 2019, @07:56AM

      by maxwell demon (1608) on Wednesday April 24 2019, @07:56AM (#834257) Journal

      Why? There's nothing wrong with naming a ship (even a space ship) “Mars”. The crew of that ships then will be Marsonauts, just like the crew of the Argo were the Argonauts.

      The bigger question is why the Apollonauts were incorrectly called Astronauts. As far as I can tell, no space ship ever has been called “Astro”.

      SCNR ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.