Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday April 24 2019, @02:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the years-of-probing-I-tell-you dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas has forced out three senior researchers with ties to China. The move comes amid nationwide investigations by federal officials into whether researchers are pilfering intellectual property from US research institutions and running "shadow laboratories" abroad, according to a joint report by Science magazine and the Houston Chronicle.

The National Institutes of Health began sending letters to the elite cancer center last August regarding the conduct of five researchers there. The letters discussed "serious violations" of NIH policies, including leaking confidential NIH grant proposals under peer review to individuals in China, failing to disclose financial ties in China, and other conflicts of interest. MD Anderson moved to terminate three of those researchers, two of whom resigned during the termination process. The center cleared the fourth and is still investigation[sic] the fifth.

The move follows years of probing from the FBI, which first contacted MD Anderson back in 2015 with such concerns, according to MD Anderson President Dr. Peter Pisters. In December 2017, MD Anderson handed over hard drives containing employee emails to FBI investigators. That same year, a report by the US Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property used some rough calculations to estimate that IP theft by all parties cost the country upward of $225 billion, potentially as high as $600 billion, each year. The report called China the "world's principal IP infringer."

Source: https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/04/nih-fbi-accuse-scientists-in-us-of-sending-ip-to-china-running-shadow-labs/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday April 25 2019, @12:57AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 25 2019, @12:57AM (#834577) Journal

    Let's play the devil's advocate for a bit

    The United States' use of public funds should benefit the United States public at large.

    And... how was the United States public at large been harmed by the knowledge leaking to China?

    You think China is going to be sharing anything? Yeah, right, they'll be sharing it, by selling it for cheaper than we can.

    Given that US has the highest cost for health care (with nothing spectacular for quality [wikipedia.org] compared to the rest of OECD), one would think the lower prices for the same medicine would be a net benefit for the US public.
    Unless, of course, Trump's trade wars will increase ... umm, yes, that's the term... tremendously the Big Pharma's bottom line. Do you think Big Pharma is "US public at large"?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2