Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 29 2019, @11:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the chain-things-up dept.

Submitted via IRC for ErnestTBass

When railroad tracks were first laid across the western U.S., there were eight different gauges all competing to dominate the industry – making a nationwide, unified rail system impossible; it took an act of Congress in 1863 to force the adoption of an industry standard gauge of 4-ft., 8-1⁄2 inches.

FedEx CIO Rob Carter believes the same kind of thing needs to happen for blockchain to achieve widespread enterprise adoption.

While the promise of blockchain to create a more efficient, secure and open platform for ecommerce can be realized using a proprietary platform, it won't be a global solution for whole industries now hampered by a myriad of technical and regulatory hurdles. Instead, a platform based on open-source software and industry standards will be needed to ensure process transparency and no one entity profits from the technology over others.

"I think we're in the state where we're duking it out for the dominant design," Carter said during a CIO panel discussion at the Blockchain Global Revolution Conference here. "We're not an organization that pushes for more regulatory control, but there are times regulatory mandates and pushes can be incredibly helpful."

Source: https://www.computerworld.com/article/3391070/fedex-cio-its-time-to-mandate-blockchain-for-international-shipping.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 30 2019, @11:39AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 30 2019, @11:39AM (#836625)

    thank you for clearing that up.
    but you may want to consult with the other users of the word "blockchain" on what it actually means.
    for instance I can complain all I want about "affect" vs "effect", but most people will not care.

    this person quoted here has communicated something to the public. they did this using a word that is known to be hyped and misunderstood by the general population, when they could have simply said "we want a unique barcode standard, and a centralized database where all the various readings of the barcode are stored".
    if the message is misunderstood, it is usually the fault of the person sending the message.

  • (Score: 1) by sshelton76 on Tuesday April 30 2019, @11:56AM

    by sshelton76 (7978) on Tuesday April 30 2019, @11:56AM (#836631)

    Well he is using it correctly. There's no misunderstanding.
    Yes people hype it, but that is not what he's doing here.

    In reality he's saying he wants a universal standard for tracking and accountability on packages.

    Something that is open technology that all shippers can subscribe to and update as your package is handed off between FedEx, DHL and/or local post.

    I have a feeling he would also like some sort of mechanism to automatically flag troubled packages as well. Such as packages which went out on a truck, but never showed up at their destination or were otherwise lost in transit. Or packages which are caught in customs, or packages which have legal issues.

    There are absolutely ways to accomplish all of that.

    But instead of government mandating it, it would be better if it were a function of an international standards body such as the UPU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Postal_Union [wikipedia.org]