Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956
[...] Combined, the loss of NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory and Glory satellites cost the space agency $700 million. In the years since, the space agency's Launch Services Program and the rocket's manufacturer, Orbital Sciences—which has since been acquired by Northrop Grumman—have been conducting investigations into what happened.
[...] But only now has the story emerged in greater detail. This week, NASA posted a summary of its decade-long investigation into the mission failures. Long story short: faulty aluminum extrusions used in the mechanism by which the payload separates from the rocket, known as a frangible joint, prevented the separation from fully occurring. Much of the report drills down into the process by which NASA reached and then substantiated this conclusion.
Source: After a decade, NASA finally reveals root cause of two failed rocket launches
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday May 02 2019, @12:43PM (1 child)
Never said any such thing.
I will say that "human factors" are a reliable confound of reproducability, and that's why you need to do more than make one of something and declare: "it is infallible because: science."
Bean counters have a magical thinking that believes increasing risk by a tiny, invisible to them, fraction on a large thing is an acceptable risk when saving a few easily demonstrated pennies.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday May 02 2019, @01:48PM
And TFA is even more precise on the causes and what more one should have done:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford