Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday May 02 2019, @03:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the delusions-of-grandeur dept.

This is a guest post by Hugh Handeyside, Senior Staff Attorney, ACLU National Security Project, Nathan Freed Wessler, Staff Attorney, ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, and Esha Bhandari, Staff Attorney, ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. It was originally posted on the ACLU Speak Freely blog.

In September 2017, we, along with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, sued the federal government for its warrantless and suspicionless searches of phones and laptops at airports and other U.S. ports of entry.

The government immediately tried to dismiss our case, arguing that the First and Fourth Amendments do not protect against such searches. But the court ruled that our clients — 10 U.S. citizens and one lawful permanent resident whose phones and laptops were searched while returning to the United States — could move forward with their claims.

Since then, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have had to turn over documents and evidence about why and how they conduct warrantless and suspicionless searches of electronic devices at the border. And their officials have had to sit down with us to explain — under oath — their policies and practices governing such warrantless searches.

What we learned is alarming, and we're now back in court with this new evidence asking the judge to skip trial altogether and rule for our clients.

Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/04/we-got-us-border-officials-testify-under-oath-heres-what-we-found-out


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:21PM (5 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:21PM (#837949) Journal

    Can you please elaborate on this Enabling Act, even while I am bracing for it?

    (I was bracing for the executive branch to dissolve the legislative and judicial branches by executive order and use the military to keep them out of their offices and buildings. It would streamline government and make things more efficient.)

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by PinkyGigglebrain on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:32PM (4 children)

    by PinkyGigglebrain (4458) on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:32PM (#837957)

    Can you please elaborate on this Enabling Act, even while I am bracing for it?

    Enabling Act of 1933 [wikipedia.org]

    --
    "Beware those who would deny you Knowledge, For in their hearts they dream themselves your Master."
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:37PM (3 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:37PM (#837961) Journal

      Wow. So it sounds like I was already waiting for the Enabling Act without realizing it. Thank you!

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
      • (Score: 2, Informative) by fustakrakich on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:58PM

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday May 02 2019, @04:58PM (#837972) Journal

        Wait no more! We now join your program... already in progress [justice.gov]... Remember this is only the pilot episode, but will probably run as long as General Hospital..

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 02 2019, @05:30PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 02 2019, @05:30PM (#838000)

        It won't come until after the hyperinflation of the USD, which is all but baked in at this point. The only other way is a debt jubilee and new world reserve currency. But most "assets" now correspond to someone else's debt, so that would mean a lot of people have a lot less wealth than they think.

        • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 02 2019, @05:37PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 02 2019, @05:37PM (#838005)

          Just the other day the treasury department released a chart showing that all new US debt will be used to pay interest on the old debt by 2024. The ponzi is accelerating to its inevitable conclusion.