Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday May 07 2019, @12:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the primary-software dept.

Submitted via IRC for ErnestTBass

From checking in at a polling place on a tablet to registering to vote by smartphone to using an electronic voting machine to cast a ballot, computers have become an increasingly common part of voting in America.

But the underlying technology behind some of those processes is often a black box. Private companies, not state or local governments, develop and maintain most of the software and hardware that keep democracy chugging along. That has kept journalists, academics and even lawmakers from speaking with certainty about election security.

In an effort to improve confidence in elections, Microsoft announced Monday that it is releasing an open-source software development kit called ElectionGuard that will use encryption techniques to let voters know when their vote is counted. It will also allow election officials and third parties to verify election results to make sure there was no interference with the results.

"It's very much like the cybersecurity version of a tamper-proof bottle," said Tom Burt, Microsoft's vice president of customer security and trust, in an interview with NPR. "Tamper-proof bottles don't prevent any hack of the contents of the bottle, but it makes it makes it harder, and it definitely reveals when the tampering has occurred."

Developed with the computer science company Galois, the kit will be available free of charge for election technology vendors to incorporate into their voting systems.

Source: https://www.npr.org/2019/05/06/720071488/ahead-of-2020-microsoft-unveils-tool-to-allow-voters-to-track-their-ballots


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 07 2019, @02:37PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 07 2019, @02:37PM (#840176)

    Don't forget a portable open source scanner to randomly spot check the the results of the commercial systems. Can't be too careful.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by DannyB on Tuesday May 07 2019, @02:58PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 07 2019, @02:58PM (#840195) Journal

    Open Source is not mutually exclusive with Commercial. This spot check system you speak of would be commercial, even if open source and auditable.

    The entire system should be open source. But it will still be purchased by local governments from commercial vendors.

    I maintain that a permanent paper human readable recountable record is a powerful protection against tampering with the systems. The technology is simply a tool to make it faster and easier to produce that paper record.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 07 2019, @04:24PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 07 2019, @04:24PM (#840241)

    yeah, pls stop using "commercial" when you mean "proprietary". it sounds like enemy propaganda.