Submitted via IRC for Fnord666
Law enforcement officers tend to frown on citizens interfering with their revenue generation. This has led to a number of First Amendment lawsuits from people arrested for warning others about [check notes] the existence of police officers in the vicinity.
One citizen was told as much when he was arrested for holding up a sign reading "Cops Ahead." One cop kept on script, referring to the man's actions as "interfering with an investigation." It wasn't an investigation. It was a distracted driving sting. The cop actually hauling him to the station was more to the point, telling the man he was arresting him for "interfering with our livelihood." First Amendment violation or felony interference with a business model? Why not both?
A lawsuit was filed in 2018 seeking a declaration that honking a car's horn is protected expression. And, all the way back in 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed over citations and arrests for flashing headlights to warn drivers of unseen officers.
A federal judge has decided -- albeit not very firmly -- that at least one of these actions is protected by the First Amendment. Wisconsin Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker says flashing your headlights to warn drivers of speed traps is expressive speech -- something cops would be better off not trying to punish. (via Volokh Conspiracy)
(Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday May 08 2019, @10:59AM (2 children)
Occhio che l'autovelox รจ tarocco e ti inchiappettano con la civetta.
Account abandoned.
(Score: 2) by Freeman on Wednesday May 08 2019, @04:21PM (1 child)
Google Translate doesn't make friendly with that phrase or it's just as cryptic as the previous post. "Watch out that the speed camera is a tarot and they will catch you with the owl."
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday May 08 2019, @06:26PM
Tarot slang for fake, auto civetta slang for police unmarked car.
Account abandoned.