Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday May 08 2019, @11:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong? dept.

NPR:

Nuclear power plants are so big, complicated and expensive to build that more are shutting down than opening up. An Oregon company, NuScale Power, wants to change that trend by building nuclear plants that are the opposite of existing ones: smaller, simpler and cheaper.

The company says its plant design using small modular reactors also could work well with renewable energy, such as wind and solar, by providing backup electricity when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
...
NuScale's design doesn't depend on pumps or generators that could fail in an emergency because it uses passive cooling. The reactors would be in a containment vessel, underground and in a huge pool of water that can absorb heat.

Presumably the biggest risk of a NuScale reactor failing is radioactive gophers?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday May 09 2019, @03:50PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday May 09 2019, @03:50PM (#841369)

    Heck, don't even bother washing the road, you could probably let your kid play in the salts sandbox-style. A banana is more radioactive. (Well maybe, if it's enriched uranium you're probably going to be getting some chain reaction effects even when heavily diluted with other elements)

    At least in terms of radiation danger - you've still got some nasty heavy-metal poisoning to worry about.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2