Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday May 08 2019, @11:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong? dept.

NPR:

Nuclear power plants are so big, complicated and expensive to build that more are shutting down than opening up. An Oregon company, NuScale Power, wants to change that trend by building nuclear plants that are the opposite of existing ones: smaller, simpler and cheaper.

The company says its plant design using small modular reactors also could work well with renewable energy, such as wind and solar, by providing backup electricity when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
...
NuScale's design doesn't depend on pumps or generators that could fail in an emergency because it uses passive cooling. The reactors would be in a containment vessel, underground and in a huge pool of water that can absorb heat.

Presumably the biggest risk of a NuScale reactor failing is radioactive gophers?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Muad'Dave on Thursday May 09 2019, @07:18PM

    by Muad'Dave (1413) on Thursday May 09 2019, @07:18PM (#841490)

    Thallium 233 and its daughter products are very nasty indeed

    Thallium-233 doesn't exist. Did you mean Thorium 233 or perhaps Protactinium-232 or Protactinium-233 [thebulletin.org]?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2