Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 11 2019, @12:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the of-course-it-would-apply-to-the-NSA-too dept.

Commissioners for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) testifying before the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on Wednesday called for a national privacy law.

Such a law would regulate how large tech and social media companies collect, manage, and retain user data.

The lack of a National Privacy Law

keeps the country from parity with the EU and its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)...

...or, for that matter, with the state of California, with its California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

Several national privacy bills have been introduced in the past 12 months. One, called the Data Care Act (DCA), was introduced by 15 senators and has strong industry support from the likes of Facebook, Apple, Verizon, Google, Twitter, Mozilla and Microsoft. Another was introduced by Washington Senator Suzan Delbene, another by Senator Ron Wyden dubbed the Consumer Data Protection Act, and still another called the American Data Dissemination (ADD) Act by Senator Marco Rubio.

Besides consumer protection, the FTC is looking for more power. Commissioners asked Congress to strengthen the agency's ability to police violations, asking for more resources and greater authority to impose penalties.

The usual concerns attend the bills such as costs to small businesses and startups, compatibility with and effect on existing privacy laws, and resistance to continuing to allow California to dictate in the tech sector.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by exaeta on Sunday May 12 2019, @04:58PM (1 child)

    by exaeta (6957) on Sunday May 12 2019, @04:58PM (#842704) Homepage Journal

    Why? I think you're forgetting something. The right to "Free Speech" is a constitutional right. There is no constitutional right to data privacy.

    In general, if I read some information, I am allowed to repeat that information to someone else. If you say "corporation may not read information" you have restricted the First Amendment right to receive information. If you say "corporation may not share information" you have restricted the First Amendment right to share information. Your friends have a First Amendment right to talk about you or any other topic. The First Amendment specifically protects my right to use your information, lawfully obtained, in nearly any way I please.

    --
    The Government is a Bird
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Hyperturtle on Wednesday May 15 2019, @04:29PM

    by Hyperturtle (2824) on Wednesday May 15 2019, @04:29PM (#843875)

    I was sort of aiming at people not being jerks with the data they end up getting.

    I'm not very concerned at 3rd party data brokers entitlements.