SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Microsoft Throws in the Towel on UWP, Elevates Win32:
Years ago — back before the launch of Windows 8 — Microsoft announced that going forward, app development would be driven by fundamentally different rules and capabilities than what had been the case before. Applications distributed via the Windows Store would be written to new standards, with new rules about what data they could access and which languages were supported. Older Win32 apps would still run, but they were ultimately intended to be replaced by an entirely new suite of applications written under new design rules, and distributed through the Windows Store.
Pretty much none of this actually happened. The Windows Store went on to become a dead-letter trainwreck of applications no one wanted or used. It was stuffed with counterfeit apps for applications like Facebook that pretended to be genuine products. Microsoft recently removed its own Office installer from the Windows Store. Over the years, Microsoft has tried rebranding its own software development push in various ways, but none of it has sparked much interest in creating UWP (Universal Windows Platform) apps. Now, the company is taking multiple steps to allow Win32 applications to take advantage of the same features it's rolled out for UWP in the past. While Microsoft isn't admitting defeat in its effort to push everyone into using the Windows Store, that's what this practically amounts to.
"You've told us that you would like us to continue to decouple many parts of the Universal Windows Platform so that you can adopt them incrementally," Microsoft corporate vice president Kevin Gallo wrote this week, in a developer-centric blog post. "Allowing you to use our platform and tools to meet you where your customers are going – empowering you to deliver rich, intelligent experiences that put people at the center."
But doesn't everyone want a program that plays for sure on Windows?
(Score: 5, Interesting) by driverless on Sunday May 12 2019, @01:00AM (3 children)
That was Microsoft's mistake (and arrogance), they figured that since they own 100% of the market they can dictate what the ecosystem has to do, like IBM dictating that everyone had to move to PS/2 and OS/2. Problem is that what people care about is stuff that runs on Win32, not whatever MS dictates everyone should be doing today. If you're going to throw away 30+ years of code base and move to something new, you may as well make it in Electron rather than tying yourself to a platform (UWP) no-one cares about and that MS will abandon in a few years when they dream up the next big thing that isn't.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 12 2019, @05:36AM (2 children)
Problem is that what people care about is stuff that runs on Win32
Not really.
Java, Javascript, python, C#. If you are doing anything else right now you are on old tech. Sorry, I was being a bit sardonic with my post about getting a job. I rather enjoyed that goofie win32 API. But going back to it I doubt anyone will.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 12 2019, @08:38AM
Aren't those languages now a bit on the old side themselves?, thought the brave new world was supposed to be all Rusty Goey?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 12 2019, @10:49PM
Most of those bindings use the Win32 APIs, well other than C#. Microsoft pushes C# and other .NET languages hard, but you can still use other languages, and most of those hit the Win32 or Win64 API. I can't really think of ones that don't.