Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 17 2019, @08:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe,maybe-not dept.

D-Wave Unveils Higher-Performance 2000Q Quantum Processor

D-Wave today debuted a new processor for quantum computing. With lower noise (noise in quantum computing is also known as quantum decoherence or error rate), the D-Wave 2000Q processor boasts up to 25 times better performance than its predecessor. It takes advantage of D-Wave's new and improved quantum computing platform announced earlier this year and is available now.

In February, D-Wave announced a new quantum annealing platform with a new qubit topology, lower noise, a higher number of qubits (for future D-Wave quantum computers), as well as hybrid software and tools that the company said it would deliver by mid-2020.

[...] D-Wave said that its customers have developed more than 150 quantum applications for the D-Wave quantum computer in areas such as airline scheduling, election modeling, quantum chemistry simulation, automotive design, preventative healthcare and logistics. Some have also developed new tools to improve the application development process.

Previously: D-Wave Announces Availability of a ~2,000 Qubit Machine and a Customer for It
Google and NASA Still on Board With D-Wave, Upgrade to 2048 "Qubits"
NASA and Google Collaboration Turns on D-Wave 2000Q System


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Friday May 17 2019, @11:16AM (2 children)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Friday May 17 2019, @11:16AM (#844662) Journal

    I'm skeptical of D-Wave. They behave like a typical for-profit corporation in which they exaggerate the performance, reliability, and feasibility of their ideas and products to the point that they are almost lying. They also promise the moon.

    What is the largest composite number that they've factored with their quantum computers? Oh, they don't do general quantum computing, they only do annealing, and have so much trouble with quantum noise that their machine is no faster than a classic computer. So their "quantum" computer can't actually run Shor's algorithm any faster than a classical computer programmed to simulate qubits. The biggest number they've successfully factored is ... only 20 bits? Or perhaps they improved to 40 bits? That's a big fail. A recent, average speed PC can factor any 80 bit number in less than 1 second. Yet their marketing went as far as to suggest that not only can their machines perform quantum computing, but that they can use this to solve NP problems in polynomial time! They backed off from that claim, but they've been making claims of that sort for quite a while now. Just making extraordinary claims like that showed them as a bunch of confidence people who don't know what they're talking about.

    25x "better performance", huh? Damned marketing speak. What does that even mean? Sounds like they don't mean 25x faster, or 25x more qubits. Maybe they mean 25x longer coherence?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday May 17 2019, @04:26PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday May 17 2019, @04:26PM (#844766) Journal

    I think we're too far into this for it to be a complete con. They've had big customers for years, and maybe people can try the cloud service.

    The marketing speak describing it as a quantum computer is inaccurate, but Google and others are getting value out of the product. Possibly extreme value if you look at the list of applications they mention.

    Shor's? Heck, we can be glad they haven't ruined RSA for everybody.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Friday May 17 2019, @05:00PM

      by bzipitidoo (4388) on Friday May 17 2019, @05:00PM (#844773) Journal

      Yes, I think it's a blend. They do have something real. But they also have hucksters who have wildly exaggerated what they have.

      Industrial sales is quite different from the popular conception of sales as exemplified by the slimy used car salesperson. The flashy hard sell that's lots of hype and little substance is not a good way to approach industrial customers. The potential buyers are not idiots, and they're going to feel plenty insulted by an approach of that sort. There are also not that many buyers, maybe no more than a few hundred. It's highly likely not to be a one time sale. Got to build a relationship. If the seller cons the buyer, the buyer will eventually realize it, and remember.

      The question is, what the heck is D-Wave doing even toying with those kinds of cheap sales tactics? Who do they think they're kidding? And isn't what they do have real enough?