Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 18 2019, @12:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the Putin-it-all-down-the-memory-hole dept.

From Eureka Alert

Researchers from the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology and their colleagues from Germany and the Netherlands have achieved material magnetization switching on the shortest timescales, at a minimal energy cost. They have thus developed a prototype of energy-efficient data storage devices. The paper was published in the journal Nature.

The rapid development of information technology calls for data storage devices controlled by quantum mechanisms without energy losses. Maintaining data centers consumes over 3% of the power generated worldwide, and this figure is growing. While writing and reading information is a bottleneck for IT development, the fundamental laws of nature actually do not prohibit the existence of fast and energy-efficient data storage.

The most reliable way of storing data is to encode it as binary zeros and ones, which correspond to the orientations of the microscopic magnets, known as spins, in magnetic materials. This is how a computer hard drive stores information. To switch a bit between its two basic states, it is remagnetized via a magnetic field pulse. However, this operation requires much time and energy.

[...] "The idea was to use the previously discovered spin switching mechanism as an instrument for efficiently driving spins out of equilibrium and studying the fundamental limitations on the speed and energy cost of writing information. Our research focused on the so-called fingerprints of the mechanism with the maximum possible speed and minimum energy dissipation," commented study co-author Professor Alexey Kimel of Radboud University Nijmegen and MIREA.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1174-7 Temporal and spectral fingerprints of ultrafast all-coherent spin switching (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1174-7)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 18 2019, @12:53AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 18 2019, @12:53AM (#844895)

    That means what? In space? In energy? Currently, the speed is the key, because they can't keep up with multiple processing cores, so all that bs with "cache" memory. And this is nothing new since the 90s.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by takyon on Saturday May 18 2019, @02:49AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday May 18 2019, @02:49AM (#844909) Journal

    It doesn't necessarily have to be faster or more energy efficient than normal memory (although it sounds like it could be both). If it can mostly match memory but also be used as dense, non-volatile storage, then you have universal memory which would be very valuable.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by maxwell demon on Saturday May 18 2019, @07:52PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday May 18 2019, @07:52PM (#845119) Journal

    Even if the memory itself were instantaneous, you cannot make the connection to the CPU arbitrarily fast. Therefore I don't think you'll get rid of cache (unless you locate the main memory right on the processor chip).

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.