Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday May 20 2019, @09:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the tick-tock dept.

Heart of next-generation chip-scale atomic clock

Described in Optica, the chip-scale clock is based on the vibrations, or "ticks," of rubidium atoms confined in a tiny glass container, called a vapor cell, on a chip. Two frequency combs on chips act like gears to link the atoms' high-frequency optical ticks to a lower, widely used microwave frequency that can be used in applications.

The chip-based heart of the new clock requires very little power (just 275 milliwatts) and, with additional technology advances, could potentially be made small enough to be handheld. Chip-scale optical clocks like this could eventually replace traditional oscillators in applications such as navigation systems and telecommunications networks and serve as backup clocks on satellites.

"We made an optical atomic clock in which all key components are microfabricated and work together to produce an exceptionally stable output," NIST Fellow John Kitching said. "Ultimately, we expect this work to lead to small, low-power clocks that are exceptionally stable and will bring a new generation of accurate timing to portable, battery-operated devices."

The clock was built at NIST with help from the California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Calif.), Stanford University (Stanford, Calif.) and Charles Stark Draper Laboratories (Cambridge, Mass.).

Zachary L. Newman, Vincent Maurice, Tara Drake, Jordan R. Stone, Travis C. Briles, Daryl T. Spencer, Connor Fredrick, Qing Li, Daron Westly, B. R. Ilic, Boqiang Shen, Myoung-Gyun Suh, Ki Youl Yang, Cort Johnson, David M. S. Johnson, Leo Hollberg, Kerry J. Vahala, Kartik Srinivasan, Scott A. Diddams, John Kitching, Scott B. Papp, Matthew T. Hummon. Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. Optica, 2019; 6 (5): 680 DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000680


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by driverless on Tuesday May 21 2019, @04:49AM

    by driverless (4770) on Tuesday May 21 2019, @04:49AM (#845720)

    Price = you can't afford it, and even if you could, you can't buy it. There have been an ongoing parade of these things, all hampered by the triple handicap that (a) it takes years for them to reach commercial production, if they ever make it that far, (b) unit production is essentially at the engineering-sample scale, you can't roll them off an assembly line, and (c) they're so eyewateringly expensive and hard to get that they only ever get deployed in military applications.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2