Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the there-is-no-cow-level dept.

Stanford researchers outline vision for profitable climate change solution

A relatively simple process could help turn the tide of climate change while also turning a healthy profit. That's one of the hopeful visions outlined in a new Stanford-led paper that highlights a seemingly counterintuitive solution: converting one greenhouse gas into another.

The study, published in Nature Sustainability on May 20, describes a potential process for converting the extremely potent greenhouse gas methane into carbon dioxide, which is a much less potent driver of global warming. The idea of intentionally releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere may seem surprising, but the authors argue that swapping methane for carbon dioxide is a significant net benefit for the climate.

"If perfected, this technology could return the atmosphere to pre-industrial concentrations of methane and other gases," said lead author Rob Jackson, the Michelle and Kevin Douglas Provostial Professor in Earth System Science in Stanford's School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences.

The basic idea is that some sources of methane emissions -- from rice cultivation or cattle, for example -- may be very difficult or expensive to eliminate. "An alternative is to offset these emissions via methane removal, so there is no net effect on warming the atmosphere," said study coauthor Chris Field, the Perry L. McCarty Director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

2m29s video.

Methane removal and atmospheric restoration (DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0299-x) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday May 22 2019, @10:44AM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 22 2019, @10:44AM (#846137) Homepage Journal

    Because methane is an order of magnitude stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. It's not that we need more CO2. It's that we need less methane.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2