Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday May 22 2019, @01:40AM   Printer-friendly

Phys.org:

Hunter-gatherers in the Philippines who adopt farming work around ten hours a week longer than their forager neighbours, a new study suggests, complicating the idea that agriculture represents progress. The research also shows that a shift to agriculture impacts most on the lives of women.

[...] Every day, at regular intervals between 6am and 6pm, the researchers recorded what their hosts were doing and by repeating this in ten different communities, they calculated how 359 people divided their time between leisure, childcare, domestic chores and out-of-camp work. While some Agta communities engage exclusively in hunting and gathering, others divide their time between foraging and rice farming.

The study, published today in Nature Human Behaviour, reveals that increased engagement in farming and other non-foraging work resulted in the Agta working harder and losing leisure time. On average, the team estimate that Agta engaged primarily in farming work around 30 hours per week while foragers only do so for 20 hours. They found that this dramatic difference was largely due to women being drawn away from domestic activities to working in the fields. The study found that women living in the communities most involved in farming had half as much leisure time as those in communities which only foraged.

Also, hunting comes with beer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by khallow on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:42PM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:42PM (#846167) Journal
    No, the real reason is population density. One can have a much higher population density with agriculture. Sure, higher population density makes it easier to rule people, it also makes it easier to compete for land with your low population density neighbors.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:59PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:59PM (#846174)

    but for it herding works loads better, as demonstrated pretty much every time. Peasants without training are useless as fighters, and no one really wants many of his peasants trained with weapons, now does he? Even with mongols at the gates he doesn't.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday May 22 2019, @11:00PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 22 2019, @11:00PM (#846410) Journal

      but for it herding works loads better, as demonstrated pretty much every time.

      There's plenty of counterexamples. China usually succeeds over its herding neighbors, for example, despite spectacular examples like the Mongolians.

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Thursday May 23 2019, @02:46AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Thursday May 23 2019, @02:46AM (#846498) Homepage

      Actually, in feudal Europe, the average peasant was required to give his lord military service NN-many days per year, and might also be required to provide his own arms (and armor, if any).

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.