Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday May 22 2019, @10:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the software-security-is-not-an-aftermarket-accessory dept.

Submitted via IRC for AnonymousLuser

Lack of Secure Coding Called a National Security Threat

The lack of secure coding is a pervasive and serious threat to national security, according to a new paper from the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology, a cybersecurity think tank.

Rob Roy, an ICIT fellow who was co-author of the report, suggests in an interview with Information Security Media Group that an app standards body could play an important role in improving app security.

"If there were some objective standards put in place that all software would have to abide by, then we could start to make progress," Roy says. "It may just be that there needs to be an objective standard ... and a legislative mandate that requires a certain level of assurance to provide an assured product."

The "call to action" report, "Software Security Is National Security: Why the U.S. Must Replace Irresponsible Practices with a Culture of Institutionalized Security," discusses systemic issues with the software development landscape and what needs to be done to rectify the problem of negligent coding. But solving the problem won't be easy, given the problems of speed-to-market pressures and the sheer number of IoT devices being produced, the report notes.

[Ed Note - for those Soylentils that are software developers, does your company provide training/mentoring on how to develop secure software?]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:58PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday May 22 2019, @12:58PM (#846173)

    so far it is mostly cheaper to pay for security cover-ups than to pay to secure software.

    So far. From the company perspective. From the customer perspective, events like WannaCry have been hugely expensive, not only the direct cost of the event itself, but the institutional reactions, over-reactions, and missed golf games while executives are dragged into meetings to explain what they're doing to prevent a recurrence.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2