Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday May 26 2019, @10:05PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-infinity-or...-never-mind dept.

According to Extreme Tech,

NASA is going back to the Moon, and this time, it intends to stay a while. That's the news from NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, who announced the first company chosen to deliver a vital component of the space agency's Lunar Gateway space station. Maxar Technologies will build the power and propulsion system for the Lunar Gateway, the first step in NASA's ambitious new Artemis project that will put humans on the Moon's surface in just five years.

"This time when we go to the Moon, we're actually going to stay," Bridenstine said. "The goal here is speed. 2024 is right around the corner."

But then, there is this:

May 24 (UPI) -- Just weeks after he was assigned to lead NASA's renewed efforts to explore the moon, special assistant Mark Sirangelo has left the space agency, officials said.

NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine announced Sirangelo's departure in an internal memo Thursday, Space News reported.

Sirangelo joined NASA last month as special assistant to the administrator and was tabbed to guide the agency's efforts to explore the lunar surface. Bridenstine said, however, that NASA's proposal for the "Moon to Mars Mission Directorate", which had support from the White House, was turned down by Congress.

"NASA proposed to the House and Senate a reorganization to establish a new mission directorate focused on a sustainable lunar campaign," Bridenstine said in a statement. "The proposal was not accepted at this time, so we will move forward under our current organizational structure within the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate."

The mission was first announced in March to meet Vice President Mike Pence's goal of returning humans on the moon by 2024.

Sirangelo appeared with other NASA officials this week at an advisory council to discuss exploration plans. At the meeting, he said he'd been working on the plan to return to the moon, a mission he called "daunting." Also at the meeting, Bridenstine said NASA needs an additional $1.6 billion for the 2020 budget to reach the goal.

"Given NASA is no longer pursuing the new mission directorate, Mark has opted to pursue other opportunities. I want to personally thank Mark for his service and his valuable contributions to the agency," Bridenstine said.

What is a young science-curious Soylentil to think?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Username on Monday May 27 2019, @02:03AM (2 children)

    by Username (4557) on Monday May 27 2019, @02:03AM (#848066)

    I think it's purely political, considering the dates 2020, and 2024. The budget is decided annually, but these are only the election years.

    What are we going to do up there anyway? Say the moon supports Hilary Clinton's 2020 campaign?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday May 27 2019, @02:09AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday May 27 2019, @02:09AM (#848068) Journal

    Best case scenario, the Gateway doesn't cost *that* much, "helps" land astronauts on the Moon, and could be used for some other purpose such as assembling space telescopes (but we could do that at the ISS, so...).

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Monday May 27 2019, @07:03AM

    by Sulla (5173) on Monday May 27 2019, @07:03AM (#848124) Journal

    Good point, we should give up on any advancement that Trump (or any politician) might claim as a win. That'll show em!

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam